nanog mailing list archives
Re: 206.82.160.0/22
From: Tony Li <tli () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 00:11:41 -0700
Noel, The only charging scheme that I can see working is to charge people for advertising routes, with the charge related to the scope over which the advertisement is seen. That way, there's a direct relationship between the amount of resources consumed, and the amount charged, which is utterly fair. Since we can now talk about charging: A global charging scheme implies that there is a centralized, global charging authority. That's unlikely to fly in any case. What MAY fly, however, is if individual backbones charge for advertisements as well as bandwidth. This would be charged back through regional ISPs, who would decide which backbones to connect to and charge back to their respective customers. Tony
Current thread:
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22, (continued)
- Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Gordon Cook (Sep 22)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Kai (Sep 22)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 John Riordan (Sep 23)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Nick Williams (Sep 23)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 John Riordan (Sep 23)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Sean Doran (Sep 23)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Hans-Werner Braun (Sep 23)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Noel Chiappa (Sep 24)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Ehud Gavron (Sep 24)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Dave Siegel (Sep 24)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Ehud Gavron (Sep 24)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Noel Chiappa (Sep 24)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Tony Li (Sep 25)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Nick Williams (Sep 25)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 David Conrad (Sep 26)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Noel Chiappa (Sep 25)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Guy Middleton (Sep 25)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Sean Doran (Sep 26)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Sean Doran (Sep 26)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Geoff Huston (Sep 26)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Noel Chiappa (Sep 26)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Noel Chiappa (Sep 26)
- Re: 206.82.160.0/22 Geoff Huston (Sep 26)
(Thread continues...)