nanog mailing list archives
Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif.
From: Tony Li <tli () cisco com>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 17:13:39 -0700
I expect that if Sprintlink were to propose a rational plan to renumber and -return- the older delegations that they would be provided with a large, single block that Sean could pursuade Sprintlink to carve up in the fashion that he indicated. Methinks that this is backwards. Sprintlink clearly has a rational plan. Obviously they cannot possibly return an older delegation until they can get more address space. It would go a long way in reducing the size of the global routing I count 45 prefixes. IMHO, someone needs to be following RIPE's guidelines and should be assigning shorter prefixes to Sprint on a per-block basis. Tony
Current thread:
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif., (continued)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. bmanning (Sep 24)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. George Herbert (Sep 24)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. bmanning (Sep 24)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. Scott Bradner (Sep 23)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. George Herbert (Sep 23)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. Sean Doran (Sep 24)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. Sean Doran (Sep 24)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. George Herbert (Sep 24)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. Sean Doran (Sep 24)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. bmanning (Sep 24)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. Tony Li (Sep 24)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. Kim Hubbard (Sep 25)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. bmanning (Sep 24)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. Noel Chiappa (Sep 25)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. Dave Siegel (Sep 25)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. Noel Chiappa (Sep 25)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. Jeremy Porter (Sep 25)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. Noel Chiappa (Sep 25)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. Nick Williams (Sep 25)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. Dave Siegel (Sep 26)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. Nick Williams (Sep 25)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. Vadim Antonov (Sep 25)
- Re: Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif. Sean Doran (Sep 25)