nanog mailing list archives
Re: Links on the blink - what will/should mci & sprint do?
From: Tony Li <tli () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 22:12:59 -0800
> If we were to seriously adopt the strategy of forwarding even when the > destination appears down, it would be necessary to support this in the > routing protocols to insure loop avoidance. This is not out of the > realm of theoretical possibility. However, we're NOT there today. Good thing too. Sounds like one of the worst ideas you've had in a very long time. Thank you, I'm honored. Just in case anyone else is equally confused, I certainly don't advocate that as a solution. It is, however, certainly one point in the solution space. Tony
Current thread:
- Re: Links on the blink - what will/should mci & sprint do?, (continued)
- Re: Links on the blink - what will/should mci & sprint do? Sean Doran (Nov 18)
- Re: Links on the blink - what will/should mci & sprint do? Stan Barber (Nov 18)
- Re: Links on the blink - what will/should mci & sprint do? Nathan Stratton (Nov 19)
- Re: Links on the blink - what will/should mci & sprint do? Sean Doran (Nov 19)
- Re: Links on the blink - what will/should mci & sprint do? Tony Li (Nov 27)
- Re: Links on the blink - what will/should mci & sprint do? Mike (Nov 27)
- Re: Links on the blink - what will/should mci & sprint do? Tony Li (Nov 27)
- Re: Links on the blink - what will/should mci & sprint do? Mike (Nov 27)
- Re: Links on the blink - what will/should mci & sprint do? Paul A Vixie (Nov 27)
- Re: Links on the blink - what will/should mci & sprint do? Curtis Villamizar (Nov 27)
- Re: Links on the blink - what will/should mci & sprint do? Tony Li (Nov 27)
- Re: Links on the blink - what will/should mci & sprint do? Mike (Nov 27)