nanog mailing list archives
Re: Address clustering intuition
From: asp () uunet uu net (Andrew Partan)
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 1995 14:13:44 -0500 (EST)
I've formed an intuition that, if all IP addresses were portable (ie. independent of ISP) and assigned on a strictly geographic basis, then there would *automatically* be clustering of addresses equivalent to that obtained from CIDRization as a result of marketplace forces and the practicalities of technology.
This turns out not to be the case at all. See the big-internet archives for lots of messages on this. --asp () uunet uu net (Andrew Partan)
Current thread:
- Address clustering intuition Walter O. Haas (Nov 09)
- Re: Address clustering intuition Alan Hannan (Nov 09)
- Re: Address clustering intuition Jim Dixon (Nov 09)
- Re: Address clustering intuition Curtis Villamizar (Nov 10)
- Re: Address clustering intuition Jim Dixon (Nov 09)
- Re: Address clustering intuition Andrew Partan (Nov 09)
- Re: Address clustering intuition Craig A. Huegen (Nov 09)
- Re: Address clustering intuition Geert Jan de Groot (Nov 09)
- Re: Address clustering intuition Alan Hannan (Nov 09)
- Re: Address clustering intuition bmanning (Nov 09)
- Re: Address clustering intuition Walter O. Haas (Nov 09)
- Re: Address clustering intuition Geert Jan de Groot (Nov 09)
- Re: Address clustering intuition Jim Dixon (Nov 10)
- Re: Address clustering intuition Alan Hannan (Nov 09)
- Re: Address clustering intuition John J. Nugent (Nov 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Address clustering intuition Hank Nussbacher (Nov 09)
- Re: Address clustering intuition Alan Hannan (Nov 09)