nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internic address allocation policy
From: ATM_Feel_the_Power <joe () net99 net>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 1995 10:13:48 -0700 (MST)
The request for a business plan was unreal. One of our customers was ready to demand the business plan for the last large provider who requested numbers. Has NET-99 been frustrated with the process ? Yes. Have we screwed up our SWIP's at times ? Yes. Has the Nic lost requests we sent in for domain names etc ? Yes. Is the Nic busy ? We all know that answer. More routes, more numbers more eveything is going to cost us in the end. When it comes to these numbers its time more of us had a say in controlling our own future. I support an increase in funding for the Nic. I have told them this many times. I also support the recall of unused or under-used numbers. By default I feel we the provider are in the position of telling our future customers why we are going to limit the amount of ip numbers we issue. Yes, I know SWIP them and they get more. Try telling that to a company who has just signed up and paid big dollars to do a nationwide 56k frame deal. Try listening to a customer saying he or she can get more numbers from another provider. Bottom line: Lets try to fix this in a common sense fashion and a reasonable time. It is possible. Joseph Stroup
Current thread:
- Re: Internic address allocation policy, (continued)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy ATM_Feel_the_Power (Mar 18)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Michael S. Ramsey (Mar 18)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy ATM_Feel_the_Power (Mar 18)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Karl Denninger (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Jonathan Heiliger (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Daniel Karrenberg (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Hans-Werner Braun (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Karl Denninger (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Hans-Werner Braun (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Karl Denninger (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy ATM_Feel_the_Power (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Paul A Vixie (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Alan Hannan (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Karl Denninger (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Ed Morin (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy George Herbert (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Alan Hannan (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy George Herbert (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Paul Traina (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Alan Hannan (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy George Herbert (Mar 19)