nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF
From: bmanning () ISI EDU (Bill Manning)
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 1995 19:25:14 -0800 (PST)
A first step of talking about the issues and how to do this (NSP performance) seems like a good idea to me.
Mind, this was tried several times before with limited success. We do, however, need updates to RFC 1291. We might also want to look at the OP-STAT WG efforts that Henry Clark and Nevell have been working on. -- --bill
Current thread:
- Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF, (continued)
- Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF Sean Doran (Mar 06)
- Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF Roger Fajman (Mar 06)
- Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF Curtis Villamizar (Mar 08)
- Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF Sean Doran (Mar 09)
- Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF Mike O'Dell (Mar 10)
- Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF Curtis Villamizar (Mar 08)
- Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF Scott Bradner (Mar 06)
- Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF Scott Bradner (Mar 06)
- Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF Stan Barber (Mar 09)
- Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF Kent W. England (Mar 10)
- Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF Jeff . Ogden (Mar 12)
- Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF Bill Manning (Mar 12)
- Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF Henry Clark (Mar 12)
- Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF bmanning (Mar 14)
- Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF Tony Bates (Mar 14)
- Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF Daniel Karrenberg (Mar 14)
- Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF bmanning (Mar 14)