![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES
From: bmanning () ISI EDU
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 07:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
(legal verbage removed so I can think) Hey Mark, How do we deal with a desire to have a "dummy" domain name that can be used in documentation? Attempts to use foo.com and xyz.com may get people into trouble. (both are registered!) We should have at least one domain that is registered but is not on the net. (in direct violation of the preceeding legal verbage) -- --bill
Current thread:
- NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Che-Hoo Cheng (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES jeff (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Mark Kosters (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES bmanning (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Mark Kosters (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES bmanning (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES bmanning (Jul 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Tim Salo (Jul 28)
- NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Roy Engehausen (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES David J. Schmidt (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Dave McGuire (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES David J. Schmidt (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Stan Barber (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Daniel M. Barton (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Scott Bradner (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Bill Woodcock (Jul 28)