nanog mailing list archives
Re: US Domain -- County Delegations
From: Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 1995 13:26:04 -0700
If a change is made, I feel it needs to be applied globally to all, not just the small businesses.
that's my feeling as well. on the other hand there are big companies out there who believe that their trademarks and service marks are bound tightly to their domain names. for them we should offer a chance to stay in .COM but for a _very_ high price -- the $25K/year figure quoted here recently wasn't unreasonable. to IBM.COM or DIGITAL.COM this is peanuts, and it will keep their lawyers happy, and it will keep IANA or Internic from being sued for restraint of trade.
Current thread:
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations, (continued)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Michael Dillon (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Nicolas Williams (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Michael Dillon (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Geert Jan de Groot (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Henry Clark (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Nikos Mouat (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Kevin Oberman (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Curtis Villamizar (Jul 27)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Interpath Hostmaster (Jul 31)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Jul 31)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Michael Dillon (Jul 27)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Bill Manning (Jul 27)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Curtis Villamizar (Jul 27)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Jul 27)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Kevin Oberman (Jul 27)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Mike Lawrie (Jul 27)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Alan Barrett (Jul 27)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Jul 27)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Michael Dillon (Jul 27)