nanog mailing list archives
Re: root name servers
From: bmanning () ISI EDU (Bill Manning)
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 1995 09:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
How about trying to move some of the root name servers to the exchange points? This will make them avaliable to all ISP/NSP's regardless of peering arrangements with others and would also improve connectivity to them. For security and stability reasons (aswell as political) they should not be run by a single organisation.
This is already being done. You have one at the DGix, the Internic machine is being moved, and there is a proposal to move/add additional servers to other exchange points around the globe. What else would you suggest doing? I'm working on a plan to restructure the mbone topology to better reflect the current actual topology. There are some other ideas in the mill. -- --bill
Current thread:
- root name servers Peter Lothberg (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers John A. Russo - Geonet Communications (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers Michael Dillon (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers Hans-Werner Braun (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers Michael Dillon (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers Bill Manning (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers Paul A Vixie (Jul 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: root name servers Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers Paul A Vixie (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers Paul Traina (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers Bill Manning (Jul 30)
- Re: root name servers Peter Lothberg (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers Bill Manning (Jul 30)
- Re: root name servers Paul A Vixie (Jul 30)
- Re: root name servers Mark Kosters (Jul 31)
- Re: root name servers Bill Manning (Jul 30)
- Re: root name servers Sean Doran (Jul 30)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: root name servers John A. Russo - Geonet Communications (Jul 29)