nanog mailing list archives
Re: Test Route
From: David R Conrad <davidc () iij ad jp>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 1995 12:39:06 +0900
As you've pointed out, by using the 1597 numbers, you're guaranteeing that that you can never use those numbers on the public Internet,
That's generally the point.
and you'll never be able to use more than one network provider.
Huh?
Even if most of a companies hosts are behind a firewall, they'd still be better off using globally unique numbers.
Yeah, there are 2^32 bits of address space, after all.
After all, if we all do our jobs right, maybe someday we can make the firewalls go away....
If we all do our jobs right, it won't matter if someone uses 1597 space. Firewalls will never go away -- they're too useful. Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- Re: Test Route, (continued)
- Re: Test Route Ehud Gavron (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route bmanning (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route bmanning (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route Paul Traina (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route bmanning (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route Cengiz Alaettinoglu (Jan 31)
- Re: Test Route Ehud Gavron (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route Jon Postel (Jan 30)
- Test Route Dino Farinacci (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route Paul Traina (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route Theodore Ts'o (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route David R Conrad (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route John Curran (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route Robert E. Seastrom (Jan 31)
- Re: Test Route bmanning (Jan 31)
- Re: Test Route Robert E. Seastrom (Jan 31)
- Re: Test Route bmanning (Jan 31)