nanog mailing list archives
Test Route
From: bmanning () ISI EDU
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 1995 13:22:25 -0800 (PST)
Hi, I have recently come across the need to test BGP peering with a number of people and have found that it is occasionally useful to establish a peer and then send a test route. There were a number of options here: 1- Use a route that I should correctly source. 2- Send the loopback address 3- Use an RFC 1597 address 4- Use the TestNetwork address Due to certain vendors/ISPs desire to (correctly) squash RFC 1597 advertisments and my inability to verify routing correctness if I propogated via third-party my internal routes, I chose to use the TestNetwork. What is the TestNetwork? zed 30% whois 192.0.2.0 [No name] (NET-TEST) Netname: AMEX Netnumber: 192.0.2.0 Coordinator: Reynolds, Joyce K. (JKR1) JKRey () ISI EDU (310) 822-1511 Record last updated on 24-Oct-94. This was a number allocated prior to RFC 1597 to assist people in correctly documenting how to configure IP in their documentation. (a fix for the infamous defaults SUN had in the config scripts for so many years) It's usefullness in testing devolves from its not being included in the RFC 1597 ban on forwarding. It seems to me that we should encourage any/all NSP/ISP types to block the following networks: 127.0.0/8 10.0.0/8 172.16.0/20 192.168.0/16 --bill
Current thread:
- Test Route bmanning (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route Ehud Gavron (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route bmanning (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route bmanning (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route Paul Traina (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route bmanning (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route Cengiz Alaettinoglu (Jan 31)
- Re: Test Route Ehud Gavron (Jan 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Test Route Jon Postel (Jan 30)
- Test Route Dino Farinacci (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route Paul Traina (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route Theodore Ts'o (Jan 30)