nanog mailing list archives
Re: routing meltdown
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () sprint net>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 1995 16:41:01 -0400
What you want is something that isn't the Internet or even a hop-by-hop destination-based connectionless packet network, but rather something akin to X.25 or ATM.
Sean.
...which requires even more state kept in gateways, and therefore more CPU required to maintain that state. Film at 11. --vadim
Current thread:
- Re: routing meltdown, (continued)
- Re: routing meltdown Nicolas Williams (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Paul A Vixie (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Nicolas Williams (Aug 12)
- Re: routing meltdown Nicolas Williams (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Tim Bass (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Jon Zeeff (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Yakov Rekhter (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Tim Bass (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Dave Siegel (Aug 13)