nanog mailing list archives
Re: routing meltdown
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 95 12:52:13 PDT
Nick,
Of course, but the server condenses all of the paths it learns at the XP to just one path per prefix learned at the XP, thus significantly reducing the load on the router: now the router has several times fewer paths to choose from and store in memory.
The amount of saving depends entirely on the average number of paths per destination at the XP. Perhaps some empirical data in this area would help to quantify the possible gain. Yakov.
Current thread:
- Re: routing meltdown Nicolas Williams (Aug 10)
- Re: routing meltdown Jon Zeeff (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Yakov Rekhter (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Jon Zeeff (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Yakov Rekhter (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown William B. Norton (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Nicolas Williams (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Yakov Rekhter (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Jon Zeeff (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Paul A Vixie (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Nicolas Williams (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Paul A Vixie (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Nicolas Williams (Aug 12)
- Re: routing meltdown Yakov Rekhter (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Jon Zeeff (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Nicolas Williams (Aug 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: routing meltdown Sean Doran (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Curtis Villamizar (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Jerry Scharf (Aug 11)