nanog mailing list archives
Re: CIDR FAQ
From: Tony Li <tli () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 01:31:43 -0700
If you router is non-expandable then bitch to your supplier, be they Cisco, Bay, the-guy-down-the-road-in-the-garage - anyone. I see we still have an education problem. Sigh. The intrinsic problem is that the routing table is growing faster than we can develop bigger routers. It's not just us. It's growing faster than the computer industry can grow memory either. [The computer industry doubles memory sizes every two years or so. The routing table doubles every nine months.] BTW - I have not studied the RFC's - so what will IPv6 do for us in the contect of routeing aggregation and latger boxes etc ? Absolutely Nothing. You end up back at hierarchical routing. IPv6 gets you a bigger address space, so it actually hurts in that it takes more memory to store a prefix. Tony
Current thread:
- Re: CIDR FAQ, (continued)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Michael Dillon (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ peter (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Nathan Stratton (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Dave Siegel (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Nathan Stratton (Aug 15)
- Message not available
- Re: PCs as routers... Jonathan Heiliger (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Tony Li (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Nathan Stratton (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Tony Li (Aug 15)
- Re: CIDR FAQ peter (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Tony Li (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Paul A Vixie (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Nathan Stratton (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Paul A Vixie (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ bmanning (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Simon Poole (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Tony Li (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Simon Poole (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Tony Li (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 17)