nanog mailing list archives
Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1?
From: bmanning () ISI EDU
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 1995 15:13:54 -0700 (PDT)
Two proposals for CIDR-style IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation were presented at the DNSIND WG meeting of San Jose's IETF. Both were thrown out, one due to its complexity and the other because it had bad failure characteristics (and I mean Really Bad) during a network partition.
If you can show me that we can avoid the complexity than I will be a happy man. The complex solution works (at least in small, test envrionments :) And I agree with Vadim on the point that WHOIS is flawed. -- --bill
Current thread:
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1?, (continued)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? bmanning (Apr 28)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Michael F. Nittmann (Apr 28)
- Re: New Header Assigned ATM_Feel_the_Power (Apr 28)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Karl Denninger, MCSNet (Apr 28)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Karl Denninger, MCSNet (Apr 22)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? bmanning (Apr 22)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Paul A Vixie (Apr 22)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? bmanning (Apr 23)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Michael Dillon (Apr 23)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? elliot (Apr 22)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Randy Bush (Apr 23)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Curtis Villamizar (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Craig Labovitz (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Sean Doran (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Jessica Yu (Apr 27)