nanog mailing list archives

Re: Sprint NAP Status


From: Farooq Hussain <farooq () hq si net>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1994 16:10:21 -0500


Cc: h.e.davies () dante org uk (Howard Davies), 
        d.r.h.davies () dante org uk (Dai Davies), nap-info () merit edu, 
        nanog () merit edu 
 
Tim Streeter wrote: 
 
Thanks for the update. One question I have about the NAPs is, is 
there anything in the NAP setup/agreement/whatever that precludes an NSP, 
present at the NAP, from accepting customer (i.e. *its* customers) 
connections to its router at the NAP location. Stated another way, can 
an NSP present at the NAP treat the NAP location as just another PoP? 
 
Yes, Pennsauken is a carrier inter-exchange point and an NSP can ask its 
carrier to provision the circuit. There is facility fee for carriers other 
than Sprint

        - Farooq


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: