nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint NAP Status
From: Farooq Hussain <farooq () hq si net>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1994 16:10:21 -0500
Cc: h.e.davies () dante org uk (Howard Davies), d.r.h.davies () dante org uk (Dai Davies), nap-info () merit edu, nanog () merit edu
Tim Streeter wrote:
Thanks for the update. One question I have about the NAPs is, is there anything in the NAP setup/agreement/whatever that precludes an NSP, present at the NAP, from accepting customer (i.e. *its* customers) connections to its router at the NAP location. Stated another way, can an NSP present at the NAP treat the NAP location as just another PoP?
Yes, Pennsauken is a carrier inter-exchange point and an NSP can ask its carrier to provision the circuit. There is facility fee for carriers other than Sprint - Farooq - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Sprint NAP Status Farooq Hussain (Sep 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Tim Streater (Sep 23)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Farooq Hussain (Sep 23)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Ittai Hershman (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Pushpendra Mohta (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Tim Salo (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status bmanning (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Paul Love (Sep 25)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status bmanning (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Tim Salo (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Farooq Hussain (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Liang T. Wu (Sep 25)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Curtis Villamizar (Sep 27)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Elise Gerich (Sep 25)