nanog mailing list archives
Re: Comments
From: bmanning () ISI EDU (Bill Manning)
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 1994 12:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
So Bill is this a trial balloon for the DC NAP to be declared a priority ? Thats what two reporters who called me this morning tried to say. Hmmm, no people sign for a NAP connection in DC. Well, the I supposed Wolff has no other option but, to declare it a PRIORITY. That would be cute. Joseph Stroup Telecommunications - Network Consultant On Thu, 1 Sep 1994, Bill Manning wrote:Actually, MFS is also playing the FDDI game. In addition, the have ethernet attachments as well. IMHO, (and speaking just for me), this NAP has the most flexable attachment policy. Thats 50% of the NAPS w/ something other than ATM day one.
No. MFS was awarded an NAP in the DC area. A brief review sez that there are differences in NAP implementation by different providers. It is incumbent of the potential players to select one or more attachment points as their needs/requirments dictate. --bill - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Comments Tim Salo (Aug 31)
- Re: Comments Milo S. Medin (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Bill Manning (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Joseph W. Stroup (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Bill Manning (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Bill Manning (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Milo S. Medin (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Martin Lee Schoffstall (Sep 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Comments Joseph W. Stroup (Aug 31)
- Re: Comments Steve Schnell, Sprint Corporation (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Dave Sincoskie (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Curtis Villamizar (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Stephen Wolff (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Martin Lee Schoffstall (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Stephen Wolff (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Curtis Villamizar (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Matt Mathis (Sep 02)