nanog mailing list archives

Re: Comments


From: "Martin Lee Schoffstall" <schoff () us psi com>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 1994 13:10:02 -0400

I thought you were serious.

Because I agree that most of the big advertisers and content people 
are in fact considering building their own networks.

Marty

Whoa!!  Sarcasm is so hard these days.  The attached list of 10 is 
fiction. Pure and Simple.  It was ment to point out that the players
on the NAPS will change over time and that my PERSONAL impression
is that the big-boys with Madison Ave backing (obscure US specific 
reference for advertizing folks) will bury the existing commercial 
players in the next few years.
This is only after I have been off my chocolete ration for too long 
and I am depressed.


I am very glad to see it. Dumb me, no one ever posted it to the other 
lists and I think its important,

Thanks,

Joseph Stroup

On Wed, 31 Aug 1994 bmanning () ISI EDU wrote:


01- RealTimeRUs Net
02- BlockbusterNet
03- GameNet
04- 1900
05- MJ/PP music&videos
06- TPCinc
07- NBC
08- EDS/RJR
09- Sprint
10- MCI

Everyone else is next tier as a reseller or vertical niche player.
Or did you not want the 5 year view?

--bill





-- 
--bill
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: