nanog mailing list archives
Re: The "best" version of "ping"?
From: Jeffrey C Honig <jch () nr-tech cit cornell edu>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 1994 19:40:12 -0400
Throughout the years, I've seen a number of different versions of "ping" with various features like: - "-f" switch which pings a destination as fast as possible - "-c" switch which acts like the ping function on a cisco router - TTL reporting - improved clock resolution - ability to specify data pattern - ability to source jumbograms
I have a version with all that which I have not packaged up. If there is interest and someone sent me a round tuit, I could make it available via FTP. It also does: - record route - loose and strict source routing - specify fixed or incremental TTL - Send ICMP MASK REQUEST packets - Send ICMP INFO REQUEST packets - IP multicast support Jeff - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- The "best" version of "ping"? Vince Fuller (Oct 04)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Jeffrey C Honig (Oct 04)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Hans-Werner Braun (Oct 04)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Eric M. Carroll (Oct 04)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Jeffrey C Honig (Oct 05)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Jamshid Mahdavi (Oct 19)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Hans-Werner Braun (Oct 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Dale S. Johnson (Oct 19)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Geoff White (Oct 19)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Tony Bates (Oct 19)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Jeffrey C Honig (Oct 19)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Jeffrey C Honig (Oct 04)