nanog mailing list archives
Re: Problems with BARRNET network 131.119.250.119
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis () ans net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 94 17:59:19 -0500
Is it useful to add Class-B-Subnets to the routing table whilst we are trying to reduce Class-C entries? This was an oversight. We are sending the subnet routes to ENSS128 in order to insure correct next-hop resolution across our DMZ network. These subnets should not have been sent to other external peers and no longer will be. Vince Fuller/BARRNet
These must be going through another AS path. AS 690 blocks further redistribution of your more specific routes. Does anyone have an AS path for these routes? Curtis - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Problems with BARRNET network 131.119.250.119 xladm (Apr 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Problems with BARRNET network 131.119.250.119 noc (Apr 12)
- Re: Problems with BARRNET network 131.119.250.119 Paul Traina (Apr 12)
- Re: Problems with BARRNET network 131.119.250.119 Curtis Villamizar (Apr 12)
- Re: Problems with BARRNET network 131.119.250.119 noc (Apr 12)