nanog mailing list archives

Re: Problems with BARRNET network 131.119.250.119


From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis () ans net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 94 17:59:19 -0500


    Is it useful to add Class-B-Subnets to the routing table whilst we are
    trying to reduce Class-C entries?
 
This was an oversight. We are sending the subnet routes to ENSS128 in order
to insure correct next-hop resolution across our DMZ network. These subnets
should not have been sent to other external peers and no longer will be.
 
      Vince Fuller/BARRNet


These must be going through another AS path.  AS 690 blocks further
redistribution of your more specific routes.  Does anyone have an AS
path for these routes?

Curtis
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: