Re: rhosts and vhost

[Robin Wood <robin () digininja org>]

On 22 May 2012 14:40, Tod Beardsley <todb () packetfu com> wrote:
> This has been a long-known limitation with anything having to do with
> HttpClient and Scanner modules, and yet, there's no bug for it. Crazy.
> I know ET skirts around the problem with WMap's custom notion of
> target lists.

It is now a feature request:

https://dev.metasploit.com/redmine/issues/6901

Robin


> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:40 AM, Robin Wood <robin () digininja org> wrote:
> > I've noticed in a few auxiliary modules you can set the RHOSTS field
> > to multiple values but only set the VHOST to a single value
> >
> >   RHOSTS                    yes       The target address range or
> > CIDR identifier
> >   VHOST                     no        HTTP server virtual host
> >
> > As it is unlikely that multiple hosts will have the same VHOST so
> > shouldn't VHOST become VHOSTS and allow a list which maps to the
> > RHOSTS?
> >
> > Robin
> > _______________________________________________
> > https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
_______________________________________________
https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework