Metasploit mailing list archives
Re: What's the easiest way to solve this problem..?
From: egypt () metasploit com
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:52:02 -0700
Sure, the easy way is to have your AutoRunScript send the second session to a different handler. egypt On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Brian <briaar () gmail com> wrote:
No easy way to do this? On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Brian <briaar () gmail com> wrote:Hey guys, If I set an AutoRunScript that duplicates my meterpreter session to the SAME handler, what's the easiest way to disable AutoRunScript after the first duplication. i.e. victim connects back, AutoRunScript creates a new meterpreter session using initial handler <NEED TO PROGRAMICALLY CLEAR AutoRunScript here or else..> victim connects back, AutoRunScript creates a new meterpreter session using initial handler victim connects back, AutoRunScript creates a new meterpreter session using initial handler victim connects back, AutoRunScript creates a new meterpreter session using initial handler victim connects back, AutoRunScript creates a new meterpreter session using initial handler victim connects back, AutoRunScript creates a new meterpreter session using initial handler victim connects back, AutoRunScript creates a new meterpreter session using initial handler victim connects back, AutoRunScript creates a new meterpreter session using initial handler ..... Thanks, -Brian_______________________________________________ https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
_______________________________________________ https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
Current thread:
- What's the easiest way to solve this problem..? Brian (Jan 27)
- Re: What's the easiest way to solve this problem..? Brian (Jan 28)
- Re: What's the easiest way to solve this problem..? Carlos Perez (Jan 28)
- Re: What's the easiest way to solve this problem..? egypt (Jan 28)
- Re: What's the easiest way to solve this problem..? Brian (Jan 28)
- Re: What's the easiest way to solve this problem..? CED (Feb 02)
- Re: What's the easiest way to solve this problem..? Brian (Jan 28)