Metasploit mailing list archives

Re: new exploit windows/browser/java_basicservice_impl doesn't accept win payloads?


From: Miguel Rios <miguelrios35 () yahoo com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 03:21:23 -0800 (PST)

Yes it did. Helped greatly.

Thanks Egypt

--- On Mon, 11/22/10, egypt () metasploit com <egypt () metasploit com> wrote:

From: egypt () metasploit com <egypt () metasploit com>
Subject: Re: [framework] new exploit windows/browser/java_basicservice_impl doesn't accept win payloads?
To: "Miguel Rios" <miguelrios35 () yahoo com>
Cc: framework () spool metasploit com
Date: Monday, November 22, 2010, 9:03 PM

It might be possible to modify the exploit to use some other method of
launching the jnlp file, but the current method of redirecting is
blocked by default IE7 and 8 when inside an iframe.  Since
browser_autopwn uses iframes for each exploit this issue makes the
exploit largely useless in that context, so I have removed it from
browser_autopwn.  I've also switched the order of targets so now
Windows should be the default.  If you want to use a Java payload, set
TARGET 1.

Hope this helped,
egypt

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Miguel Rios <miguelrios35 () yahoo com> wrote:

Hi,

I've been messing around with the new exploit mentioned above. However, although when I open the ruby file I can see 
the option to use windows as well as java payloads, the exploit fails when it attempts to use a windows payload. I 
even tried with browser_autopwn and it also picks a windows payload by default, although it fails.

I get this message:

[*] [2010.11.22-17:49:54] Starting exploit windows/browser/java_basicservice_impl with payload 
windows/meterpreter/reverse_tcp
[-] [2010.11.22-17:49:54] Exploit failed: windows/meterpreter/reverse_tcp is not a compatible payload.
[-] [2010.11.22-17:49:54] Failed to start exploit module windows/browser/java_basicservice_impl


Is this a bug? Also, while I'm at it, why can't we have these browser exploits write to an html file instead of 
serving the html on the fly? Writing to a file would allow for greater stealthiness and other goodies (like iframes), 
but it may not be feasible. Just an idea I thought I'd throw out.

Thanks


_______________________________________________
https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework




      
_______________________________________________
https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework

Current thread: