Metasploit mailing list archives
McAfee VirusScan vs Metasploit Framework v2.x
From: cbyrd01 at gmail.com (Chris Byrd)
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:25:55 -0600
This got my installation a few weeks ago, but isn't this a good thing? It also considers pwdump, nmap, and other programs "Potentially Unwanted Programs" (PUP). I'd rather know if someone is installing this stuff on company PCs. The label "Trojan" might not be right, but I wouldn't mind if it is considered a PUP. If you don't want it nuking your tools, then with McAfee on-access scanning, you can exclude files or directories on specific computers or by group. On 12/9/05, H D Moore <hdm at metasploit.com> wrote:
Heh, time to bring up the heat, going to post this to full-dis and see if the horde can help drive the point across. Thanks! -HD On Friday 09 December 2005 13:06, wastedimage wrote:This started several weeks ago, I've been unable to get them to change their stance..Hence the relatives have all been recommended to switch to a different product (common you know you have no idea what your mom wants for xmas) heh..
Current thread:
- McAfee VirusScan vs Metasploit Framework v2.x H D Moore (Dec 09)
- McAfee VirusScan vs Metasploit Framework v2.x wastedimage (Dec 09)
- McAfee VirusScan vs Metasploit Framework v2.x H D Moore (Dec 09)
- McAfee VirusScan vs Metasploit Framework v2.x Chris Byrd (Dec 09)
- McAfee VirusScan vs Metasploit Framework v2.x ExploiT (Dec 09)
- McAfee VirusScan vs Metasploit Framework v2.x H D Moore (Dec 09)
- McAfee VirusScan vs Metasploit Framework v2.x wastedimage (Dec 09)