Information Security News mailing list archives

Study lauds open-source code quality


From: InfoSec News <isn () c4i org>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 02:28:43 -0600 (CST)

http://news.com.com/2100-1001-985221.html?tag=fd_top

By Stephen Shankland 
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
February 19, 2003

A consulting group that scrutinizes the source code underlying several
operating systems has found that a key networking component of Linux
is of higher quality in many regards than competing closed-source
software.

Reasoning, which sells automated software inspection services,
scrutinized part of the code of the Linux and five operating systems,
comparing the number and rate of programming defects. Specifically,
Reasoning examined the TCP/IP, a key networking technology, and found
fewer errors in Linux.

"The open-source implementation of TCP/IP in the Linux kernel clearly
exhibits a higher code quality than commercial implementations in
general-purpose operating systems," the company said in a report
released last week. Reasoning also compared the code with that used in
two special-purpose networking products and found it superior to one
of them.

The Linux defect rate was 0.1 defects per 1,000 lines of code,
Reasoning found. The rate for the general-purpose operating
systems--two of them versions of Unix--was between 0.6 and 0.7 per
1,000 lines of code. The rates for the two embedded operating systems
were 0.1 and 0.3 per 1,000 lines of code.

Source code is the collection of instructions written by people and
later translated into "binaries" that computers can understand.  
Companies such as Oracle and Microsoft typically sell binaries
incomprehensible to humans rather than the comparatively
understandable source code.

Reasoning's findings help to validate the views of open-source
advocates such as Eric Raymond, who argue that the wider scrutiny
possible with open-source software means that problems are found more
quickly. "Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow," the reasoning
goes.

It's an argument that Reasoning Chief Executive Scott Trappe agrees
with.

"Open-source applications...allow anyone to look at the source code.  
For major open-source applications, such as the Linux kernel, the
Apache Web server, etc., dozens or hundreds of people will read the
source code either to learn how it works, make modifications or look
for mistakes," Trappe said. "Because the development process is also
open, these independent reviewers can report the defects they find and
even suggest appropriate fixes."

"Unfortunately, this process takes too long for most commercial
product development cycles," Trappe said.

Reasoning declined to disclose which operating systems it compared
with Linux, but said two of the three general-purpose operating
systems were versions of Unix. The comparison was done with version
2.4.19 of the Linux kernel. For the comparison products, the company
had access to the source code that for proprietary software normally
is a closely guarded secret.

Prevailing versions of Unix on the market today include Sun
Microsystems' Solaris, IBM's AIX and Hewlett-Packard's AIX. They
compete with Linux from companies such as Red Hat and SuSE as well as
Microsoft's Windows.

Microsoft, a strong advocate of proprietary software, has backed off
its earlier legal argument against the General Public License (GPL)  
that governs Linux and many other open-source projects. The company
had argued the "viral" open-source software license could force other
software projects to become open-source as well if used together.

Now seeing more benefits to sharing its source code, though, Microsoft
has begun letting some countries look at the code behind Windows and
even build versions of the product themselves.

Reasoning looked for programming problems such as memory that was
marked as free when it was in fact still in use, memory that was being
used without being properly initialized, and attempts to store data
that exceeded the space reserved for it. This last problem is often
associated with buffer overruns, a major weakness that under some
circumstances can let an attacker take over a computer.

Trappe said his company didn't measure the comparative performance of
the different versions TCP/IP, something that would have been
difficult because of hardware differences such as network acceleration
hardware on the network-specific products.



-
ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org

To unsubscribe email majordomo () attrition org with 'unsubscribe isn'
in the BODY of the mail.


Current thread: