Interesting People mailing list archives
Re Facebook Shouldn't Fact-Check
From: "David Farber" <farber () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:12:18 -0500
Begin forwarded message: From: Dan Gillmor <dan () gillmor com> Subject: Re: [IP] Re Facebook Shouldn't Fact-Check Date: December 1, 2016 at 11:07:16 AM EST To: dave () farber net What I'd like to see the big platforms do it become the leaders in promoting media literacy, as opposed to being the arbiters of truth themselves. https://medium.com/@dangillmor/facebook-google-twitter-et-al-need-to-be-champions-for-media-literacy-a58ecea5edbe#.ouema4qsb
They can help their users develop skills that are absolutely essential: namely how to be critical thinkers in an age of nearly infinite information sources — how to evaluate and act on information when so much of what we see is wrong, deceitful, or even dangerous. Critical thinking means, in this context, media literacy.
On 12/01/2016 08:57 AM, Dave Farber wrote:
Begin forwarded message:*From:* Dan Gillmor <dan () gillmor com <mailto:dan () gillmor com>> *Date:* December 1, 2016 at 10:46:18 AM EST *To:* dave () farber net <mailto:dave () farber net> *Subject:* *Re: [IP] Facebook Shouldn't Fact-Check* I agree with Lessin in a general way on this topic. But her "disclosure" about her husband's connection to Facebook was way, way shy of complete, as NYT public editor notes in a harsh (for the Times) piece: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/30/public-editor/facebook-jessica-lessin-liz-spayd-public-editor.html
This is a perfect example of how even our best news organizations --
whether through carelessness, indifference, or worse -- sometimes poison trust in their products. On 12/01/2016 08:06 AM, David Farber wrote:Begin forwarded message: *From: *Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne () warpspeed com <mailto:dewayne () warpspeed com> <mailto:dewayne () warpspeed com>> *Subject: **[Dewayne-Net] Facebook Shouldn't Fact-Check* *Date: *December 1, 2016 at 9:26:24 AM EST *To: *Multiple recipients of Dewayne-Net <dewayne-net () warpspeed com <mailto:dewayne-net () warpspeed com> <mailto:dewayne-net () warpspeed com>> *Reply-To: *dewayne-net () warpspeed com <mailto:dewayne-net () warpspeed com> <mailto:dewayne-net () warpspeed com> Facebook Shouldn’t Fact-Check By Jessica Lessin Nov 29 2016 http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/29/opinion/facebook-shouldnt-fact-check.html
<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/29/opinion/facebook-shouldnt-fact-check.html?em_pos=large&emc=edit_ty_20161129&nl=opinion-today&nlid=63457&ref=headline&te=1&_r=1>
We finally got a grudging mea culpa from Mark Zuckerberg <http://www.npr.org/2016/11/19/502717970/mark-zuckerberg-addresses-fake-news-on-facebook>:
an admission that fake news is a significant problem that his social
network must help solve. But as a journalist who has been covering the inner workings of the technology industry for more than a decade, I find the calls for Facebook <http://www.nytimes.com/topic/company/facebook-inc?inline=nyt-org> to accept broad responsibility for fact-checking the news, including by hiring editors and reporters, deeply unsettling. What those demanding that Facebook accept “responsibility” for becoming the dominant news aggregator of our time seem to be overlooking is that there’s a big difference between the editorial power that individual news organizations wield and that which Facebook could. Such editorial power in Facebook’s hands would be unprecedented and dangerous. We can all agree that Facebook should do much more to make sure that blatantly fabricated claims that Donald J. Trump won the popular vote or received the pope’s endorsement don’t spread and are, at a minimum, labeled fakes. Facebook admits, and my sources confirm, that it can do a better job of this by helping users flag dubious articles and predicting fakes based on data it has for search. This doesn’t have to involve humans: Facebook could decide to label content as suspected as fake if it was flagged a certain number of times and if it displayed other questionable attributes. Such a move would not mean Facebook’s taking broad responsibility for what’s true. But hiring editors to enforce accuracy — or even promising to enforce accuracy by partnering with third parties — would create the perception that Facebook is policing the “truth,” and that is worrisome. The first reason has to do with the nature of Facebook’s business. The second has to do with the news business. One thing is clear to anyone who has worked in a newsroom: Not all fact-checking decisions are black and white. Did the pope endorse Mr. Trump? He did not. [snip] Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/1961540-ecb5e68f> | Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&> Your Subscription | Unsubscribe Now <https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?&&post_id=20161201100640:C020F304-B7D7-11E6-A120-B4587E3DD8DC>
[Powered by Listbox] <http://www.listbox.com>
-- Dan Gillmor dangillmor.com/about <http://dangillmor.com/about> +1.650.868.7528Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/1961540-ecb5e68f> | Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&>
Your Subscription | Unsubscribe Now
<https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?&&post_id=20161201105747:E4F85DA0-B7DE-11E6-A19A-A09712D18662>
[Powered by Listbox] <http://www.listbox.com>
-- Dan Gillmor dangillmor.com/about +1.650.868.7528 ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/18849915-ae8fa580 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-aa268125 Unsubscribe Now: https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-32545cb4&post_id=20161201111228:F1FAFFD8-B7E0-11E6-85A2-F32D6C5F6C1C Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Re Facebook Shouldn't Fact-Check Dave Farber (Dec 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re Facebook Shouldn't Fact-Check David Farber (Dec 01)