Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: eBooks are not worth the paper they aren't printed on
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 18:21:30 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: "Amy Wohl" <amy () wohl com> Date: May 2, 2010 10:26:52 AM EDT To: <dave () farber net> Subject: RE: [IP] eBooks are not worth the paper they aren't printed on As someone who has had a Kindle since its first week, I really agree with this. I’m in the process of moving and going through my 10,000 “real” books. The ones I no longer need I am giving away—in some cases to friends, in others to a charity. In any case I have the right to pass them on. I could even sell them, if I wanted to take the time. I can read my “Kindle” books on a number of devices, but I generally read them on the Kindle. I enjoy that and I enjoy not having more books to find space for, but I hate their limited “shareability.” For that reason, some kinds of books I still buy on paper so I can pass them on or keep them in an ongoing collection (for me that means cookbooks and science fiction). I hate the pricing model. Even at $9.99 for a new trashy suspense book, they’re more expensive than the paperbacks I would normally have waited for (hardbacks are too big for planes) and I can’t pass them along. And, of course, that $9.99 price is rapidly eroding as Amazon reacts to Apple’s deal with the publishers. You’re right, Bob, the model is broken and we need a new one. Amy Wohl Amy D. Wohl Editor, Amy Wohl's Opinions 40 Old Lancaster Road, #608 Merion, Station, PA 19066 610-667-4842 amy () wohl com www.wohl.com From: David Farber [mailto:dave () farber net] Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 10:59 AM To: ip Subject: [IP] eBooks are not worth the paper they aren't printed on Begin forwarded message: From: "Bob Frankston" <Bob19-0501 () bobf frankston com> Date: May 1, 2010 9:43:58 AM EDT To: <nnsquad () nnsquad org>, <dave () farber net> Cc: <danb () bricklin com> Subject: eBooks are not worth the paper they aren't printed on The iPad once again has brought the issue of eBooks to the fore. I’ve been following the pricing battle. The idea of eBooks is wonderful but DRM, Digital Rights Management, makes it difficult to pretend that the DRMed eBooks are just like their printed cousins. The attempt to price those eBooks at the same price as printed books is fundamentally wrong. These eBooks are typically worth substantially less than the printed books because DRM is far more onerous than the limitations imposed by paper as a token of ownership. I can only view the eBooks on a limited number of devices. I can try to game the system by treating my family as a group but that has its own problems. No sharing, trading, and with most readers I can’t even copy the text to a clipboard. If we had rational pricing then DRM should knock most of the value off the book. Of course things are more complicated because some books work as transient “reads” and should be priced as a read. Others are more archival and lose value if they can’t be shared. And some indeed work as personal active documents whose value on a device is more than it would be in a printed form. Rather than trying to carry an old business model forward we need to recognize that an eBook is a new creature and that DRM should one of the factors in determining, limiting, the price. Once we get past the attempt to bring the old model forward we can create a variety of new “books”. Some would be subscriptions with updates. Others would be more like apps and some would become family heirlooms. Archives ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- eBooks are not worth the paper they aren't printed on David Farber (May 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: eBooks are not worth the paper they aren't printed on David Farber (May 02)
- Re: eBooks are not worth the paper they aren't printed on David Farber (May 02)
- Re: eBooks are not worth the paper they aren't printed on Dave Farber (May 02)