Got SPAM?

[Dave Farber <dfarber () me com>]

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Randall <rvh40 () insightbb com>
> Date: June 25, 2010 9:22:35 PM EDT
> To: David Farber <dave () farber net>, Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne () warpspeed com>
> Subject: Got SPAM?

> Supreme Court of California, June 21, 2010
> Kleffman v. Vonage Holdings Corp., No. S169195
> In plaintiff's class action suit under section 17529.5(a)(2), which makes it unlawful to advertise in a commercial 
> e-mail advertisement (i.e. spam) that "contains or is accompanied by falsified, misrepresented, or forged header 
> information," dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a claim is affirmed as sending commercial e-mail 
> advertisements from multiple domain names for the purpose of bypassing spam filters is not unlawful under section 
> 17529.5(a)(2).
>
> Read more... <http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/californiastatecases/s169195.pdf?DCMP=NWL-pro_classaction>



-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com