Interesting People mailing list archives

Banks Set for Record Pay - 18% over last year!!


From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:45:51 -0500





Begin forwarded message:

From: Rahul Tongia <tongia () cmu edu>
Date: January 15, 2010 3:54:37 PM EST
To: dave () farber net
Cc: ip <ip () v2 listbox com>
Subject: Re: [IP] Banks Set for Record Pay - 18% over last year!!
Reply-To: tongia () cmu edu


Dave,

I wouldn't necessarily use words like "crime" - it's a manifestation of limited transparency, limited choices, and limited *employment* "liquidity" which leads to the high pay scales for the "geniuses" in finance.

YES, they have a contract with certain bonus claims. Gee, manage/ manipulate/achieve the targets for a quarter and get massive bonuses - cha-ching. What about long-term value? Sustainable growth?

The problem is, to me, very similar to medicine where we have super- super specialists in fields including cosmetic surgery (or even cardiac surgery) making 10x what a pediatrician or family medicine or even internist makes. If you claim, oh, supply and demand, you're missing the complete lack of equilibrium at stake. More than such a thing, at a SOCIETAL level, society needs more doctors of the latter ilk (not to mention nurses). But med students don't want those specializations in part cause the pay is low (and they have debt), and the "stigma" that they weren't good enough to get the super specialization residencies. Will the market increase the salaries for the needed doctors? They haven't much in the last few years.

The market does work for doctors in some ways - when a family member was choosing where to work after finishing residency, salaries for NYC were half those of rural America - supply and demand. But he was a specialist. Incentives weren't quite as strong for the family medicine types of fields.

SO, if society would be *better off* (net social welfare) with more general/primary care physicians, and we're not getting them, then we need to (gasp) intervene. Something as simple as interest free loans or partial debt forgiveness are some options.

Thus far, I haven't gotten to the issue of whether certain finance jobs are worth the high salaries (including bonuses). For those who think we need less of such jobs, maybe ending such bonuses is the market signal that will make sure less people go into that field. One could counter that lower salaries would reduce the incentives for the best and the brightest to join that field. First of all, I would posit that the people in such jobs aren't the best and the brightest society produces. Second, even if they are, their motivation is financial profit maximization (and self-earning, like all people). The system isn't set up to make sure that societal benefit aligns with such goals.

Rahul



On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Dave Farber <dfarber () me com> wrote:

>From: "Ronald J Riley (RJR)" <rjr () rjriley com>
>To: <dave () farber net>
>Date: January 14, 2010 09:50:54 PM EST
>Subject: Banks Set for Record Pay - 18% over last year!!
>
>
>Dave,
>
>WSJ is reporting:
>
>Major U.S. banks and securities firms are on pace to pay their people about >$145 billion for 2009, a record sum that indicates how compensation is
>climbing despite fury over Wall Street's pay culture.
>
>An analysis by The Wall Street Journal shows that executives, traders, >investment bankers, money managers and others at 38 top financial companies >can expect to earn nearly 18% more than they did last year -- and slightly
>more than in the record year of 2007. The conclusions are based on an
>examination of securities filings for the first nine months of 2009 and
>revenue estimates through year-end.
>
>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704281204575003351773983136.ht
>ml?mod=djemalertNEWS
>
>===
>
>This is absolutely outrageous. These shysters stole half or more of our >collective life savings and then bought and conned our legislators into >giving them a bailout which we will all pay for, every man, woman and child >will be paying for this for decades. Nothing has changed in this industry. >It is staggering and must be reigned in. When are the people going to wise
>up and start tossing incumbents out?
>
>Ronald J. Riley,
>
>
>I am speaking only on my own behalf.
>Affiliations:
>President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
>Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
>Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
>President - Alliance for American Innovation
>Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder
>Paul Heckel
>Washington, DC
>Direct (810) 597-0194 / (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 8 pm EST.
>
>
>


-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Current thread: