Interesting People mailing list archives
good read -- Porn in the USA: Conservatives are biggest consumers
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 10:01:46 -0500
From: Stewart Baker <stewart.baker () gmail com> Date: Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:15 AMSubject: Re: [IP] Re: Porn in the USA: Conservatives are biggest consumers
To: dave () farber net Dave, Actually, for domestic flights, homeland security doesn't get travel reservation data, or any other data about travelers. The Secure Flight program, which would allow DHS to screen travelers against the no-fly list, has been delayed by at least five years by privacy advocates and Congress because they were reluctant to let DHS have access to travelers' names and birthdates. As a result, DHS has had to rely on the airlines to administer the no-fly list. Since spending money on overhead IT systems is not a high priority for the airlines, the ultimate result is that thousands, perhaps millions, of travelers have been subjected to no-fly delays because they have names (but not birthdates or other data) that overlap with a terrorist's. These people (Ted Kennedy among them) are privacy victims, inconvenienced daily by an irrational privacy restriction imposed by Congress and privacy advocates. Luckily, DHS has now finished jumping over the hurdles erected by Congress, so this inconvenience will end in the next year or so. But I'm really writing to object to the underlying assumption of the story. It's only newsworthy if the red states are somehow revealed to be hypocrites by the credit card data. That's the implied conclusion of the story: Conservatives like porn more than liberals, even though they pretend to hate it. But the anonymization by zip code makes that conclusion unsupportable. What we know is that states (or zip codes) that vote conservative seem to buy online porn at least as much as states or zip codes that vote liberal. But reliably "conservative" states may be 48% liberal, while liberal states are 52% liberal. That's a big deal in politics, a less big deal when looking at market stats; with a 4% swing in politics, many market conditions can drive statistical differences much more than political conditions. So, here are other conclusions that are just as plausible from the same data: 1. Liberals actually buy more porn than conservatives, but in liberal states, they can buy porn (for cash) by going to physical stores. In conservative states, those stores are banned or scarce, so liberals have to go on line. 2. Conservative states are less computer-savvy and thus less likely to use file-trading networks, so people pay for porn in those states rather than getting it free. 3. Conservatives buy less porn but their consciences require that they pay for it; liberals are more likely to ignore copyright restrictions, so their consumption doesn't show up in an analysis of credit card payments. I don't actually know whether any of these things are so, because the data are simply insufficient. Of course they were insufficient for the conclusions implied in the original press coverage of the topic, too. Where are all the people who usually complain when the press commits some form of innumeracy? Stewart On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:51 AM, David Farber <dave () farber net> wrote:
Begin forwarded message: From: Peter Swire <peter () peterswire net> Date: March 1, 2009 10:12:42 PM EST To: "dave () farber net" <dave () farber net> Subject: RE: [IP] Re: Porn in the USA: Conservatives are biggest consumersBrock Meeks asks very good questions, which essentially boil down to this --was the research done consistent with strong privacy protections? As Brock and many readers of this list know, there have been painfulepisodes where data was released for research purposes in the belief that privacy was protected. Then, the data was linked to an individual. One example was when AOL released the records of online searches, and a numberof the indviduals were identified. As a more general matter, LaTanya Sweeney and others have shown that "deidentified" data can often be "reidentified."On the other hand, research is often a Good Thing. In the medical realm, research can go forward consistent with the HIPAA privacy rule in severalways -- consent by the patient, deidentification, approval by the Institutional Review Board, or subject to a data use agreement.Other privacy laws, and many privacy policies, do not have any similar pathto conducting research.I think policymakers, and readers of this list, should want to accomplish the Good Thing of research and the Good Thing of privacy when possible. Asa rough guide, the following should be considered:1. Release data to researchers in truly deidentified form. That may have happened in the porn study, if the data was kept at the zip code level. (Then again, the list of credit card purchases may be like the AOL list of search terms -- some purchases or search terms are idiosyncratic enoughthat, combined with public records, the person can be identified.)2. Consider creating Institutional Review Boards or the equivalent so that good practices are followed. It is true that IRBs can be a bureaucraticburden. But they also are an institutional mechanism to come up with protocols that meet good standards. 3. Consider releasing the data under data use agreements that bind theresearchers. In this way, the researcher breaches a contract if names orother personal data are released outside the scope of the permitted research.Steps such as these can help us get useful research while also protectingindividuals against privacy invasions they can't control. Peter Prof. Peter P. Swire C. William O'Neill Professor of Law Moritz College of Law of the Ohio State University Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress (240) 994.4142, www.peterswire.net -----Original Message----- From: David Farber [mailto:dave () farber net] Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 6:02 PM To: ip Subject: [IP] Re: Porn in the USA: Conservatives are biggest consumers Begin forwarded message: From: "Brock N. Meeks" <bmeeks () cox net> Date: March 1, 2009 1:50:27 PM EST To: <dave () farber net>, <jwarren () well com> Subject: Re: [IP] Porn in the USA: Conservatives are biggest consumers Leaving the original <ahem> thrust of this message aside, my foremost question was "how did the researcher obtain this data?" I've known Jim Warren for a couple of decades and I know how he valuesprivacy, which is why I'm curious as to why Jim didn't raise the subjecthimself. In the New Scientist article, we read the researcher has a client that runs adult entertainment web sites and that this company provided the researcher "with roughly two years of credit card data from 2006 to 2008 that included a purchase date and each customer's postal code." Say what? I'm sure the last thing these subscribers thought their credit card info would be used for was any kind of social behavior study. Perhaps the "privacy" policies of such web sites informed subscribers thatsuch a use of their information would be possible (I've not studied theprivacy policies of such web sites, I just look at the pictures... Wait...)If say, oh, for example, the Airline industry, turned over this kind of"anonymized" credit card data to homeland security for a study of (whatever) I think Jim would be more than a bit concerned.Now, I suppose such a hypothetical sets up a comparison as to who is the more trustworthy: the adult entertainment industry, the researcher, theairline industry or Uncle Sam. I leave that debate to more informed colleagues. --Brock On 3/1/09 10:21 AM, "David Farber" <dave () farber net> wrote:Begin forwarded message: From: Jim Warren <jwarren () well com> Date: February 28, 2009 4:27:59 PM EST To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net> Subject: Porn in the USA: Conservatives are biggest consumers From the New Scientist - http://bit.ly/ZkOq 27 February 2009 by Ewen Callaway Americans may paint themselves in increasingly bright shades of red and blue, but new research finds one thing that varies little across the nation: the liking for online pornography.A new nationwide study (pdf) of anonymised credit-card receipts from amajor online adult entertainment provider finds little variation in consumption between states. "When it comes to adult entertainment, it seems people are more the same than different," says Benjamin Edelman at Harvard Business School. However, there are some trends to be seen in the data. Those states that do consume the most porn tend to be more conservative and religious than states with lower levels of consumption, the study finds. ...<big snip>...------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
-- Stewart Baker 202-641-8670 -- Stewart Baker 202-641-8670 ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- good read -- Porn in the USA: Conservatives are biggest consumers David Farber (Mar 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: good read -- Porn in the USA: Conservatives are biggest consumers David Farber (Mar 02)