Interesting People mailing list archives

Re: Be afraid, be very afraid Health Info


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 05:14:50 -0400



Begin forwarded message:

From: DV Henkel-Wallace <gumby () henkel-wallace org>
Date: April 5, 2009 7:57:13 PM EDT
To: Charles Pinneo <pinneo () sbcglobal net>
Cc: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: Re: [IP] Re:     Be afraid, be very afraid Health Info

On the HLI, even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

More generally I don't understand the rush to electronic health records, of all things. There are some serious technical and institutional problems to be addressed (I'm not talking about privacy or other t social issues) and until they have been I don't see the point and in fact consider the shift quite risky.


-d


On 5 Apr, 2009, at 15:22 , Charles Pinneo wrote:

DV,

Did you look up the Heartland Institute? It's a hard right organization. They don't even believe in evolution. Back to 1850 for science. They support big tobacco. They are against taxes. Is that enough for you?

Charles Pinneo
pinneo () sbcglobal net
On Apr 5, 2009, at 8:13 AM, David Farber wrote:



Begin forwarded message:

From: DV Henkel-Wallace <gumby () henkel-wallace org>
Date: April 5, 2009 1:04:49 AM EDT
To: David Farber <dave () farber net>, Steve Lamont <spl () ncmir ucsd edu>
Subject: Re: [IP] Re:   Be afraid, be very afraid Health Info

I have HIPPA training (though there are varying levels of "trained" and mine is at the bottom, or simplest). Although the heartland institute's prognosis was over the top it was not as far off the likely mark as one might like to think.

First of all it does seem like most people I was exposed to were pretty serious about the privacy issue. But the fines, as noted, aren't really large by prosecutorial standards and there are prohibited behaviors which have no punishment at all. I.e. don't do this but if caught don't worry about it. Examples appeared on the IP list when HIPPA was first proposed.

Second of all we've all seen the kind of database scope creep that comes with systems not designed with privacy in from the get go. Cell tower and toll data is now routinely used in criminal and civil cases. CC records too. Why not health data? You can be sure it will happen.

And the risk of catastrophic (to the victims) loss due to data being hoisted by a malicious group of employees is high but largely ignored in system design and in legislation.

In short: _don't_ turn the page in this case. (however I agree with your attitude to the H.I. in most cases).

-d

From: Steve Lamont <spl () ncmir ucsd edu>
Date: April 4, 2009 9:47:06 AM EDT
To: dave () farber net
Subject: Re: [IP] Be afraid, be very afraid Health Info

April 2, 2009 (Network World) Maureen Martin of The Heartland
Institute, a think tank promoting public policy based on individual
liberty, limited government and free markets, argues that the new
Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH)
Act exposes too much personal information.

Heartland Institute is also very much in the forefront of the climate change (aka global warming) denial movement, and is funded by numerous
extremely conservative foundations, such as the Scaife Foundations,
which also funded the highly corrosive "Arkansas Project" durning the Clinton administration, the John M Olin Foundation, and Walton Family
Foundation.  It was funded by ExxonMobil between 1998 and 2005,
according to Source Watch.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Heartland_Institute

When Heartland speaks, I generally turn the page.





-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com






-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Current thread: