Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: a pricing model?? and local phone service
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:45:35 -0700
________________________________________ From: Sam Simon [ssimon () amplifypublicaffairs net] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 10:42 AM To: David Farber; ip Subject: RE: [IP] Re: a pricing model?? Actually Dave, the argument goes back to the old phone company effort to charge by the minute for local phone service. The old telephone company issue in fact was local service. When ATT was "the phone company" it launched a nationwide campaign to get every state to adopt "Local Measured Service." (LMS) The original proposal was to meter every call. It was rejected in all but a few states. Eventually ATT/Bell moved to offering a low monthly rate/measured option, which is available today but hardly ever used by consumers. And measure is usually per-call, not per-minute. Consumer groups lead the fight against LMS. ATT's argument was that the heavy users were the cost causers. Most independent studies done at the time however argued that it was only peak use that had a cost impact. The argument was that the marginal cost of one phone call was or approached zero, unless it pushed peak demand. The studies also looked at whether the cost of measuring out-weighed the benefit of time shifting or demand suppression. As I recall it, most said it was likely a wash. In my view the best work done on this was by Bridger Mitchell when he was Rand. Here is a reference http://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P6495/ to one of his papers on the topic. " Alternative measured-service rate structures for local telephone service" Sam ------------------- Samuel A. Simon Chairman, Amplify Public Affairs, LLC 919 18th Street 10th Floor Washington, DC 20006 (202)263-2901(v) (202)263-2961(f) (202) 318-0210 (e-fax) (c) 202-329-1851 IM: SamSimon SKYPE: samsimonoffice SecondLife:samuelsimon allen ------Original Message----- From: David Farber [mailto:dave () farber net] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 10:05 AM To: ip Subject: [IP] Re: a pricing model?? ________________________________________ From: Tice DeYoung [ticed () bellatlantic net] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 9:41 AM To: David Farber; ip Cc: Tice DeYoung Subject: Re: [IP] a pricing model?? Dave, What goes around seems to always come back again. Charging by the bit smacks of the old phone company's charge by the minute for long distance. The metering ate up about eighty percent of the operating costs, hardly cost effective. Richard could explain this better. Tice ------------------------------------------- Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com ------------------------------------------- Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Re: a pricing model?? and local phone service David Farber (Jun 16)