Library of Congress on DMCA, Copyright Law Troubles

[David Farber <dave () farber net>]

________________________________________
From: Randall Webmail [rvh40 () insightbb com]
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 2:42 AM
To: dewayne () warpspeed com; johnmacsgroup () yahoogroups com; David Farber
Subject: Surely EFF won't mind a full-text quote of this?

<http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/07/library-congress-dmca-copyright-law-troubles>

Library of Congress on DMCA, Copyright Law 
Troubles<http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/07/library-congress-dmca-copyright-law-troubles> Posted by Hugh 
D'Andrade<http://www.eff.org/about/staff/hugh-dandrade>

The chorus of voices criticizing the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA<http://www.eff.org/issues/dmca>) has just 
gotten a bit louder with the addition of a new and authoritative voice: The Library of Congress. In a new report, 
jointly released with the U.K.'s Joint Information Systems Committee, Australia's Open Access to Knowledge (OAK) Law 
Project, and the Netherlands' SURFfoundation, the Library of Congress' National Digital Information Infrastructure and 
Preservation Program points out that the work of preserving, documenting and archiving the nation's intellectual output 
is made unnecessarily difficult by antiquated copyright law exceptions and limitations, and TPM (technological 
protection measure) laws designed to restrict the making of digital copies.

ArsTechnica has a 
review<http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080716-library-of-congress-drm-a-serious-obstacle-to-archiving.html> of 
the report, citing the many absurd paradoxes of trying to make archival copies in a legal environment that views 
copying as a suspicious and possibly illegal act. The DMCA, for example, bans not just the act of circumventing DRM 
copy restrictions, but also the sale or trafficking in the software or tools that enable circumvention. And while the 
Librarian of Congress is authorized to craft exemptions under appropriate circumstances to the DMCA's ban on 
circumvention, there wouldn't be much of a market for tools to accomplish that circumvention, since only those who fall 
within an exemption could use them. So even if libraries were granted an exemption from the ban on circumvention for 
the purposes of digital archiving, they might well be unable to obtain the tools to do so — because they would still 
generally be illegal.

The report was released the day before a WIPO seminar on Digital Preservation and Copyright 
issues<http://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/2008/cr_wk_ge/>. In the international context, it is worth noting that some 
countries have adopted a more forward-looking approach to laws regulating technological protection measures than the 
inflexible DMCA. One example is New Zealand's recently revised Copyright 
Law<http://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2006/0102-3/latest/096be8ed801aae8a.pdf> (PDF), which permits 
libraries and archives to access circumvention tools to circumvent TPMs on behalf of end users if the TPMs interfere 
with non-copyright infringing uses.

ArsTechnica cites these other examples:

...One big issue is the exemption for published works in a library's collection; these can also be copied three times, 
but only to "replace a work in their collections that is damaged, deteriorating, lost or stolen or whose format has 
become obsolete." In other words, librarians can't backup or archive such works until destruction is well under way.

In addition, "obsolete" doesn't mean what you or I might mean by the term; the Library notes that LPs still can't be 
copied into digital archives because record players remain available on the open market and are therefore not 
"obsolete."

Check out the ArsTechnica 
article<http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080716-library-of-congress-drm-a-serious-obstacle-to-archiving.html>, 
and the new report is 
here<http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/partners/resources/pubs/wipo_digital_preservation_final_report2008.pdf> (PDF).



-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com