Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: New iPhone applications vs. (permanent) battery life?
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:45:38 -0700
________________________________________ From: Kobrin, Steve [kobrins () wharton upenn edu] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:43 PM To: David Farber Subject: RE: [IP] New iPhone applications vs. (permanent) battery life? Dave, I have an ipod touch I upgraded to 2.0 and I have downloaded several of the new apps. Most can only work when I am on wireless and I notice that the device gets hot as you said and that the battery indicator seems to drop as I watch it. I do not use it for email, so it that is not it. Wireless was always battery intensive on the touch, but not like this. As much as I like the ipod touch and the iphone, I would not think of giving up my BB (t-mobile) until both Apple and ATT get their act together. I have called t-mobile at all hours of the night from all over the world when I have a problem, and they are typically there and helpful. Steve -----Original Message----- From: David Farber [mailto:dave () farber net] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:47 PM To: ip Subject: [IP] New iPhone applications vs. (permanent) battery life? It is my experience that battery life is much worse in practice. I have a 1st gen iPhone with 2.0 software. Periodically the phone gets hot as hell. Why, no ideabut the battery goes down fast. Might be the "push" mail but sometimes it is good sometimes bad . mail always runs? By the way I am still deeply disturbed by the lack of understanding of Apple that many of their customers do not enjoy standing in line in the heat just because Apple can not seem to understand scheduling . Weird. Dave Crocker might have it right. Dave ________________________________________ From: Lauren Weinstein [lauren () vortex com] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:26 PM To: David Farber Cc: lauren () vortex com Subject: New iPhone applications vs. (permanent) battery life? Dave, Given the iPhone's expensive to replace (for non-hackers) "permanent" battery, I'm interested in reports of rapid battery decline associated with the rash of new iPhone applications, many of which involve keeping the display lit, long-period data streaming, etc. Question: Will the new applications make the non-user-replaceable battery much less palatable than previously, given that many users may burn through its available cycle life much more rapidly than before? Thanks. --Lauren-- Lauren Weinstein lauren () vortex com or lauren () pfir org Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 http://www.pfir.org/lauren Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org Co-Founder, NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad - http://www.nnsquad.org Founder, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- New iPhone applications vs. (permanent) battery life? David Farber (Jul 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: New iPhone applications vs. (permanent) battery life? David Farber (Jul 17)