Interesting People mailing list archives

Re: Open source software developers sue Verizon; Claim FiOS violates GPL


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:36:25 -0500



Begin forwarded message:

From: Andrew C Burnette <acb () acb net>
Date: December 14, 2007 12:04:58 AM EST
To: dave () farber net
Subject: Re: [IP] Re: Open source software developers sue Verizon; Claim FiOS violates GPL

Dave, et al,

Verizon simply has to comply with the law, the GPL and release the
source code. No innovation has been or is stifled at all. Should you
choose to use GPL licensed code to create a new [software] product,
simply follow the rules. In academic circles, using someone else's code
and not referencing the author, well, you get the idea; It's cheating
plain and simple.

Without the legal threat of injunction, Verizon (or Actiontec) would
have no incentive to respond, much less comply. That's where you have to
separate legal tactics from compliance with license requirements of
openly distributed code. I'd hardly expect to hear critical comments if
openbox was a closed source product.

Software can be developed both ways (open v. closed source) effectively.
But to say that misuse of a package under one license and refusal to
comply with said license is stifling innovation doesn't really make much
sense when you look at the facts, does it?

Verizon got caught using a shortcut (someone else's code), and simply
has to own up to it, comply with the GPL, and all is forgiven. plain and
simple.

thx,
andy burnette

David Farber wrote:


Begin forwarded message:

From: Tom Gray <tom_gray_grc () yahoo com>
Date: December 12, 2007 3:20:17 PM EST
To: dave () farber net, tom_gray_grc () yahoo com
Subject: Re: [IP] Open source software developers sue Verizon; Claim
FiOS violates GPL

Prof Faber

For your IP list, if you think it suitable.

I wonder if the prolifieration of open source and open
source law suits will tend to stifle innovation. This
law suit is looking for an injunction on the use of a
piece of software. This is the ultimate penalty in
patent law and one that is not causally given.

Tom Gray


--- David Farber <dave () farber net> wrote:



Begin forwarded message:

From: dewayne () warpspeed com (Dewayne Hendricks)
Date: December 11, 2007 3:52:07 PM EST
To: Dewayne-Net Technology List
<xyzzy () warpspeed com>
Subject: [Dewayne-Net] Open source software
developers sue Verizon;
Claim FiOS violates GPL

Open source software developers sue Verizon; Claim
FiOS violates GPL
Information Week
By Paul McDougall

In what could become a major test case for the most
widely used open
source software license, a group that represents
open source
developers has sued Verizon Communications --
claiming that the
telecom giant's FiOS broadband service violates the
terms of the GNU
General Public License.

In court papers filed Friday, The Software Freedom
Law Center
maintains Verizon's use of an open source program
called BusyBox in
FiOS violates version 2 the GPL because Verizon has
not made the
product's source code available to its customers--as
the license
requires.

Since November 2006, "Verizon has distributed to the
public copies of
the firmware in the infringing product, and none of
these
distributions included source code to BusyBox or
offers to provide
such code," SFLC alleges in its complaint, which was
filed in federal
court in New York.


<http://www.informationweek.com/shared/printableArticle.jhtml?articleID=204800422





-------------------------------------------
Archives:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com





____________________________________________________________________________________

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs


-------------------------------------------
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


-------------------------------------------
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Current thread: