Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: Wikipedia -- tracking down self-serving anonymous edits
From: David Farber <dfarber () cs cmu edu>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 06:17:48 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: "David P. Reed" <dpreed () reed com> Date: August 24, 2007 8:23:52 PM EDT To: dave () farber net Cc: ip () v2 listbox comSubject: Re: [IP] Wikipedia -- tracking down self-serving anonymous edits
Though I agree that Wikipedia is not an authoritative source, this does raise the question of what is an authoritative source.
Presumably depending on the "fact" in question, what makes a source authoritative is highly context dependent.
So here's a question: on a matter of (say) historical fact such as who first reached America by sea, who *would* be an authoritative source, and how could you tell?
To be honest, I'd trust Wikipedia articles that have been actively edited by a wide community far more than I would some self-proclaimed expert who takes cash to appear on a typical Fox News or CNN show. And probably more than someone who wrote a book whose goal is to make the best-seller list by being "interesting" (or worse).
Of course, one can always trust people with Ph.D.'s. :-) David Farber wrote:
Begin forwarded message: From: Mary Shaw <mary.shaw () gmail com> Date: August 19, 2007 11:12:10 AM EDT To: David Farber <dave () farber net> Subject: Wikipedia -- tracking down self-serving anonymous edits Dave,Although Wikipedia is not -- by its very nature -- an authoritative source, many people treat it as if it were.Now the vulnerabiilty of Wikipedia to self-serving edits has been made more visible. Virgil Griffith, a grad student at Caltech, has created the Wikiscanner, which traces IP addresses of anonymous edits back to the organizations that hold the IP addresses.Article from The Independent at http://news.independent.co.uk/ sci_tech/article2874112.ece has a long list of examples, such as "The National Rifle Association of America doctored concerns about its role in the increase in gun fatalities by replacing the passage with a reference to the association's conservation work in America. "Article from New York Times at http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/19/ technology/19wikipedia.html? em&ex=1187668800&en=550ef6c65ceb3535&ei=5087%0A gives other examples.Wikiscanner web site at http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/ provides various sorts of search.Mary ------------------------------------------- Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
------------------------------------------- Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Wikipedia -- tracking down self-serving anonymous edits David Farber (Aug 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Wikipedia -- tracking down self-serving anonymous edits David Farber (Aug 25)