Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: the godlike power of IPR owners
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 08:35:11 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Matt Blaze <mab () crypto com> Date: April 7, 2007 6:56:36 PM EDT To: dave () farber net, dpreed () reed com Subject: Re: [IP] the godlike power of IPR owners On Apr 7, 2007, at 18:29, on IP, David P. Reed wrote:
Apparently, an amendment pushed by RIAA and MPAA to a California bill against pretexting (pretending to be someone to deceive someone into giving you that person's private info) is asking for an exemption of owners of copyrights, patents, trade secrets, etc.http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-pretext7apr07,1,1936238.story? coll=la-headlines-business&ctrack=1&cset=trueWe have seen this before, granting IPR owners the rights to invade computers, install viruses, etc.Though it bothers me greatly that IPR owners get a special deal (but owners of jewelry, for example, do not, though they might want to find a thief, too), I am particularly bothered because it is so easy to become an "owner of IPR".In fact, this email is IPR, born copyrighted to me. So I guess I don't need to worry about pretending to be someone else (or obeying any other law the RIAA doesn't like to be constrained by).The IPR bar should be ashamed of itself.
And especially ironic is that this proposed exemption would seem to cover the very circumstances of the incident that prompted the bill in the first place:
in which a corporate board member was being investigated for a suspected intellectual property violation (disclosing HP's trade secrets). -matt ------------------------------------------- Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- the godlike power of IPR owners David Farber (Apr 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: the godlike power of IPR owners David Farber (Apr 08)