Interesting People mailing list archives
more on ICANN ordered by Illinois court to suspend spamhaus.org
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:16:52 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Jonathan Ezor <jezor () tourolaw edu> Date: October 11, 2006 12:58:38 PM EDT To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker () bbiw net> Cc: David Farber <dave () farber net>Subject: RE: [IP] more on ICANN ordered by Illinois court to suspend spamhaus.org
Dave (and the other distinguished signatories) and Dave F. (our IP host),
I am not pleased with having my client's name mentioned in the context of this discussion, and I would hope that it does not go out over the IP list. I did not mention the client, nor was its name and background (or alleged activity, which was mischaracterized) relevant to the overall discussion, nor do you have all the facts that I have (and cannot share due to my obligations
to my client).Setting that aside, I appreciate the chance to discuss and even debate these
issues with those of you who are on the front lines of the fight againstspam. We may continue to disagree on Spamhaus' particular approach (and in my mind, a faq answer saying that Spamhaus will "pay little attention" to my request for review of a client's status on a block list is caustic, as were
the communications I received, but that's a personal opinion), or theobjectivity of its standards, or the facts of the e360 case (about which I know only what is in the public record from both sides). My article is not
about Spamhaus or the e360 situation; it examines the reality of spamfilters, the possibility of wrongful inclusion of a company within one, and what remedies under U.S. law a true non-spammer might have if it is unable to
get redress from the filter vendor any other way. It looks at thealready-litigated cases, examines the arguments (which primarily focus on 47
USC 230 and its safe harbor, which probably wouldn't apply to aself-generated list like those of Spamhaus), and considers some other legal
theories and how they might be evaluated.I've said it before, and I'll say it here: I completely oppose unsolicited
bulk commercial e-mail, and not just that defined by the (rather weak)CAN-SPAM Act. I said so in my book "Clicking Through" six years ago, I have
so advised every client who's asked me about it, and I've gone on recordabout it. Spamming is just a bad idea, and leads to trouble. I use multiple levels of block lists and filters daily (and in fact, my employer, Touro Law
Center, utilizes Spamhaus as it turns out for at least some of its spamfighting, so I benefit from its efforts myself), and have spoken in detail with sysadmins about the battle, its costs, and the impact on infrastructure and users alike. At the same time, though, when any organization or vendor
takes on the job of defining spam and establishing filters for multiplemillions of users, I believe it has an ethical obligation to be responsible, professional, objective, diligent, and take reports of its errors seriously. It's true of Symantec; it's true of Microsoft; it's true of Spamhaus. Yes,
spammers will tie up the courts and hire lawyers to make threats, but consider that legitimately blocked non-spammers may have to use the samecourts and lawyers to get assistance when a block list vendor refuses to make
changes.If any of you is ever in the Long Island, NY area and would like to speak to my students about the real world issues relating to spam, just give the word
and I'll make it happen. Thanks. {Jonathan} ------------------- Prof. Jonathan I. Ezor Assistant Professor of Law and Technology Director, Institute for Business, Law and Technology (IBLT) Touro Law Center 300 Nassau Road, Huntington, NY 11743 Tel: 631-421-2244 x412 Fax: 516-977-3001 e-mail: jezor () tourolaw edu -----Original Message----- From: Dave Crocker [mailto:dcrocker () bbiw net] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 11:57 AM To: David Farber; ip () v2 listbox com Cc: Jonathan Ezor Subject: Re: [IP] more on ICANN ordered by Illinois court to suspend spamhaus.org Importance: High ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on ICANN ordered by Illinois court to suspend spamhaus.org David Farber (Oct 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- more on ICANN ordered by Illinois court to suspend spamhaus.org David Farber (Oct 12)