Interesting People mailing list archives
more on Call for comments - Preliminary Task Force Report on the Purpose of Whois and of the Whois Contacts
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:47:46 -0500
-------- Original Message --------Subject: Re: [IP] more on Call for comments - Preliminary Task Force Report on the Purpose of Whois and of the Whois Contacts]
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:37:55 -0500 From: Steven Champeon <schampeo () hesketh com> To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net> CC: andyo () oreilly com References: <43E90FEF.6030803 () farber net> on Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 04:23:59PM -0500, Dave Farber forwarded:
-------- Original Message -------- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 16:07:34 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Oram <andyo () oreilly com> To: dave () farber net Here's some heartfelt commentary from someone who DOES own a domain name and does NOT want to be identified. (But I got permission to circulate the text.)
<snip> Anonymous Blogger says:
For some of us, the question isn't a trademark worry, but a life and death question of avoiding stalkers. For some, it's a question of harrassment lawsuits designed to destroy free speech.
In other words, the right of a blogger to have their blog hosted on their own domain name, purely for vanity's sake (as it's easy enough to blog in relatively anonymous fashion via blogspot et al) - this trumps the necessity, to anyone responsible for administration of any other Internet-connected system - to know who's behind all the spam, abuse, virus infections, etc. and to whom to report compromised servers, spam, phishing scams, and other abuse coming from whatever box happens to host your blog? I'm sorry, but that's pure, unadulterated paranoid nonsense. Your right to anonymity ends when you connect to the network we happen to share, and especially so when abuse comes from wherever it is you're connected, or worse, when you provide criminals with the tools to attack others, by way of insecure webhosting control panels, amateurish CGI scripts, insecure NAT setups, or whatever the path may take. If you /really/ want anonymity, have your ISP or some other trusted party (such as a lawyer, accountant, etc) listed as the Billing Contact and/or Admin Contact. Please make sure the Technical Contact is correct and kept up to date. I'm so sick of reading whois records that are pure fiction, with "555" tel and fax numbers, nonexistent street addresses, abuse contacts in nonexistent domains, zip codes that disagree with the state/town/country/whatever and are obviously made up on the spot. And ICANN is a joke. It took them a /year/ to investigate and deactivate the domains of a certain Brian Westby, who forged our domain into the sender addresses of a massive spam run back in early 2003 (we're sure it was him because the outscatter contained domains registered to one or more of his sock puppet operations, and because the crud stopped almost immediately after the FTC /filed an injunction against him/ in April 2003.) But it still took ICANN a year to disable his domains. http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2003/04/westby.htm This is hardly keeping up with the spammers, when they rotate through multiple domains per day (and have been since, oh, 2003 or so, if notearlier).
Feh. Fix whois. Please. Make accountability mean something again. Steve -- hesketh.com/inc. v: +1(919)834-2552 f: +1(919)834-2554 w: http://hesketh.com/ antispam news, solutions for sendmail, exim, postfix: http://enemieslist.com/ ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on Call for comments - Preliminary Task Force Report on the Purpose of Whois and of the Whois Contacts Dave Farber (Feb 08)