Interesting People mailing list archives
Cell Phone tracking legislation
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:01:51 -0500
Begin forwarded message: From: Ben Masel <bmasel () tds net> Date: December 5, 2006 9:59:47 PM EST To: dave () farber net Subject: Cell Phone tracking legislation For IP:Rep. Marlin Schneider has initiated legislation in Wisconsin to limit retention of location data by cell carriers absent customer opt-in, and requiring warrants for real-time tracking by State and Local law enforcement.
We're still waiting on the Legislative Reference Bureau for actual text.US House Rep. Tammy Baldwin has expressed a willingness to introduce something similar at the Federal level.
Any thoughts on what exceptions should be included in such a bill? A parental exception seems inevitable.
When I bounced the State version off a Republican legislator, he wanted an employer exemption, with notice, employer pays for the phone, and would only get records for hours the person carrying it is getting paid.
From: David Farber <dave () farber net> Date: 2006/12/05 Tue AM 04:14:39 CST To: ip () v2 listbox com Subject: [IP] more on How To Tell If Your Cell Phone Is Bugged Begin forwarded message: From: Phil Karn <karn () ka9q net> Date: December 4, 2006 9:26:42 PM EST To: dave () farber net Cc: ip () v2 listbox com Subject: Re: [IP] How To Tell If Your Cell Phone Is BuggedA story is making the rounds right now regarding FBI use of cell phones as remote bugs (e.g. http://news.com.com/ 2100-1029-6140191.html ).Personally I am much more concerned about the use of mobile phones as physical tracking devices than as audio bugs. Every mobile phone, whenever it's turned on, is *already* a physical tracking device. *EVERY* mobile phone. Even when idle, phones periodically transmit "registration" messages to the base station so that the network will know where to deliver an SMS or inbound call message. (This is why airlines require phones to be completely shut off in flight; it's not sufficient to simply avoid making calls to prevent transmissions.) In the old analog days, low user populations and lack of automatic wide-area roaming sometimes made it practical to "flood" paging messages over a network so that mobile registrations were not necessary. But flood paging has long become impractical in digital cellular networks. Cellular networks have a perfectly legitimate need to know where you are, at least to the nearest cell sector, so they can do their job. The recent addition of GPS reporting to E911 calls increases the positioning accuracy still further. And this is what's so problematical. Location data, like so much other personal data necessarily collected in the routine operation of modern communication networks, has both benign -- lifesaving, even -- and harmful uses. At least the content confidentiality problem has an effective technical defense (end to end encryption) even if it isn't widely used. But there seems to be no such technological defense against the abuse of cellular location data. Your only choice is to turn your phone off, preferably by removing the battery, when you don't want to be tracked. If you turn it on, even for a moment, the system will again know where you are. Another alternative is to forego a cell phone in favor of a one-way pager, if they're even still available. But should you answer a page, even with a pay phone, you could in principle still be tracked unless you encode your pages. ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as bmasel () tds net To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ipArchives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting- people/
------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- Cell Phone tracking legislation David Farber (Dec 05)