Interesting People mailing list archives
more on Katrina, view from afar (Figaro) (fwd)
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:57:56 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Marc <marcaniballi () hotmail com> Date: September 20, 2005 7:55:58 AM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: RE: [IP] more on Katrina, view from afar (Figaro) (fwd)Let's also not forget that the primary cause of the deaths in France during
the 2003 heat wave were dehydration and dehydration related illness. Airconditioning is not a very common appliance in France, the climate does not
really warrant it (coastal temperate zones aside, let's remember thatMarseille (the most southern major center in France) is the same latitude as
Toronto! The "heat wave" would have been considered temperate by Texan standards.Reports have shown that the majority of deaths occurred in elderly retirees
who lived alone and had no support network. This brought about a lot ofquestions about how the elderly are sometimes "abandoned" by their families and how to better handle the situation in the future. The most notable thing to come out of this was that the general public is now aware that you can die of dehydration without ever feeling "thirsty," and that the elderly are especially at risk due to the higher probability of a dysfunctional internal thermostat. In effect, the disaster could largely have been averted had the victims simply drank a bottle of water a day, whether they were thirsty or
not. Now while the tragedy is all the more poignant for the simplicity of itssolution - I do not see how a strong industrial complex would have saved the
day. Mr. Todd did not blame the Katrina disaster on America (or Bush, orneo-cons, etc.) - he (IMHO) simply pointed out that a country with a strong
industrial complex (such as post-war America) would have been better prepared to weather the crisis, and manage its aftermath. Whether he is correct or not is immaterial - it seems to be a well thought out opinion that offers a different perspective on the larger situation and may hopefully get a few creative minds thinking along different lines and possibly coming up with some innovative solutions to America's troubles. Where's the harm in that? Marc -----Original Message----- From: David Farber [mailto:dave () farber net] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 7:12 PM To: Ip Ip Subject: [IP] more on Katrina, view from afar (Figaro) (fwd) Begin forwarded message: From: Rahul Tongia <tongia () andrew cmu edu> Date: September 19, 2005 6:57:00 PM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: Re: [IP] more on Katrina, view from afar (Figaro) (fwd) Dave, I would tend to agree with <chodge5 () utk edu> that no matter how advanced a society is, it can face failures. However, two reactions: 1) The US was dealing with a "point-source" problem, where more precise effort would have been important, while in Europe, you had tens of millions of homes to "protect." They need different thinking, planning, and intervention. Not all natural disasters are the same. 2) It is possible to admit that BOTH screwed up. Given humankind's general (and well-documented) overemphasis on acute instead of chronic problems (e.g., a plane crash instead of poor kids starving, which kills many, many more), NOLA stands out as a failure even when there was extensive modeling and recognition of the threat. In contrast, while there was the knowledge that many people were at risk in Europe, it was not known who, where, and exactly when. A somewhat different problem (but with commonalities). Rahul --On Monday, September 19, 2005 6:35 PM -0400 David Farber <dave () farber net> wrote:
Begin forwarded message: From: chodge5 () utk edu Date: September 19, 2005 6:17:18 PM EDT To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net> Subject: [IP] more on Katrina, view from afar (Figaro) (fwd)And, BTW, much less than the more than 35,000 killed by a heat wave in Europe two summers ago. You recall the debate that set off about European heartlessness, racism and discrimination? No, neither do I.IPers might be interested in Philip Klinkner's recent post at PolySigh http://polysigh.blogspot.com/2005/09/overstating-katrina.html I think Klinkner is at Hamilton College. The post has a number of very good links, but the passage I thought worth noting was: Compare the Katrina tragedy to the heatwave that struck Western Europe in the summer of 2003. We still don't know the death toll from Katrina, but most indications are that the early prediction of 10,000 plus deaths were wildly off the mark and the actual toll will be less than half of that. In contrast, the 2003 heatwave led to the deaths of 35,000 Europeans. In France there were nearly 15,000 dead and in Paris alone, 1854 people perished. Thus, looking only at deaths, the heatwaves were a much great disaster for Europe than Katrina is likely to be for the U.S. And like the Bush administration, the French government was criticized for its laggard response to the calamity--including the fact that the prime minister and health minister were away on vacation when the disaster struck. According to the Economist, the health minister was criticized because (shades of President Bush strumming his guitar in Crawford): His first reaction had been a television interview showing him, in a T-shirt in the garden of his holiday home in the Var, arguing, unworried, that all was under control. Nor, like Katrina, was this disaster unforseen. One Paris doctor said at the time: Last summer the situation was catastrophic and this year it is worse; we were not at all prepared. The hospital system is failing. Finally, most of those that died were from the most vulnerable segments of European society, the elderly, particularly those who were poor and lived alone. This is despite the fact that for several generations, most European nations have constructed social safety nets to provide for the care and well-being of their citizens, especially the elderly. What's the upshot of all of this? The lesson of Katrina and the European heatwave is that natural disasters can have a devastating impact on even the most advanced and wealthy nations, and that this impact has little or nothing to do with the governing structure, ruling party, or political culture of those nations. It is no more accurate to claim that the heatwave deaths in France are the result of unworkable welfare state or the indifference of morally lax society, than it is to claim that the Katrina victims are the result of conservative social policy, racism, or free market economics. ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as tongia () andrew cmu edu To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
------------------------------------- You are subscribed as marcaniballi () hotmail com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ipArchives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting- people/
------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on Katrina, view from afar (Figaro) (fwd) David Farber (Sep 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- more on Katrina, view from afar (Figaro) (fwd) David Farber (Sep 19)
- more on Katrina, view from afar (Figaro) (fwd) David Farber (Sep 19)
- more on Katrina, view from afar (Figaro) (fwd) David Farber (Sep 20)