Interesting People mailing list archives
more on NRA and MPAA/RIAA legal hypocrisy
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:41:11 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: "Robert M. McClure" <rmm () unidot com> Date: October 20, 2005 5:28:55 PM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: Re: [IP] NRA and MPAA/RIAA legal hypocrisy At 04:07 PM 10/20/2005 -0400, Richard Forno wrote:
Subject: NRA and MPAA/RIAA legal hypocrisy Let me see if I understand this correctly --- software makers can be suedand taken to the cleaners by "victims" of crime (eg, MPAA/RIAA), yet gunmakers would be protected when their products are used in the commission of a crime. Does anyone else notice the hypocrisy here? -rick
No hypocrisy, just a misinterpretation of the state of affairs. The court decision holding software makers liable for copyright infringement was *only if* the software makers encouraged such use, or if the software had no other purpose. I feel sure that if gun makers encouraged buyers to commit crimes that even under the new law, they would be held responsible. In other words, aiding and abetting can make one responsible. Bob McClure ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on NRA and MPAA/RIAA legal hypocrisy David Farber (Oct 20)