Interesting People mailing list archives
more on Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Terminati on Fees Hurt Consumers
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:47:04 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Michael Kende <Michael.Kende () analysys com> Date: October 11, 2005 10:47:48 AM EDT To: dave () farber net Cc: Robert Daffin <rsd3414 () ACRretail com>Subject: RE: [IP] more on Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Terminati on Fees Hurt Consumers
One would have thought that with number portability operators would have changed these practices for a couple of reasons. Prior to number portability, it is likely that many of the most attractive (business) customers were loyal mainly because on average they could least afford to change their phone numbers, but now of course these customers are free to shop around. Operators of course always know more about their own customers (average monthly bill, quick payment of bills, etc.) than they could possiblly know about potential new customers (who have signalled that they are not loyal to their existing provider) so I would have thought they would try to identify and retain their best customers with some type of loyalty plans. I should say that whenever I call my provider to ask about getting a new phone they always look up my number and offer me a cheap handset if I sign another long-term contract, but they have never offered me any loyalty deal out of the blue. Michael -----Original Message----- From: David Farber [mailto:dave () farber net] Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 10:25 AM To: Ip Ip Subject: [IP] more on Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Terminati on Fees Hurt Consumers Begin forwarded message: From: Robert Daffin <rsd3414 () ACRretail com> Date: October 11, 2005 9:49:56 AM EDT To: "'dave () farber net'" <dave () farber net> Subject: RE: [IP] more on Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Terminati on Fees Hurt Consumers My wife and I use Nextel. I purhcased both phones (Motorola i90's) at a steep discount in exchange for a one year contract nearly three years ago. I've been month-to-month with them ever since the contract expired, and there have been no changes in my terms of service. I do occasionally get flyers that offer me some slight savings for signing a new service contract. Out of curiosity, I investigated the purchase of two new phones from Nextel several months ago, but was surprised to discover that the steep discounts offered are only available to new customers. Thus, even if I was willing to sign a two year contract to get new phones, I'd have to do it with another carrier to get the discount. I find it fascinating that Nextel is willing to offer such deals to attract new customers, but is uninterested in offering the same to retain existing customers, even when every other provider out there offers competitive new customer discounts to current Nextel customers. I don't know how the recent mergers will affect our situation in the future, but for now, we're content with our phones, our plan, and our service. If we ever decide that we need new phones, or if Sprint/Nextel decides to try to force us into a new contract, we'll likely have no choice but to go to another provider, in spite of our overall satisfaction with Nextel. It is no wonder that there is so much customer churn in the cellular market. -R -----Original Message----- From: David Farber [mailto:dave () farber net] Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 5:01 PM To: Ip Ip Subject: [IP] more on Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Termination Fees Hurt Consumers Begin forwarded message: From: Gerry Faulhaber <gerry-faulhaber () mchsi com> Date: October 10, 2005 2:12:10 PM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: Re: [IP] more on Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Termination Fees Hurt Consumers Dave [for IP]-- Could we hear from an IPer who is either with Verizon Wireless/ Cingular/Sprint or who has direct experience with real world data? Are there differences across carriers? (Normally, if there's an anticompetitive practice going on, I would expect this to become a dimension of competition) Gerry ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Farber" <dave () farber net> To: "Ip Ip" <ip () v2 listbox com> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 10:47 AM Subject: [IP] more on Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Termination Fees Hurt Consumers
[My experience with Cell Companies is not what Gerry describes. I always supply the phone since I am not happy with the cell phones sold
in the USA. Yet I am tied up with 1 or 2 year contracts with $175 cancellation agreements. Why?? djf] Begin forwarded message: From: Gerry Faulhaber <gerry-faulhaber () mchsi com> Date: October 9, 2005 1:13:21 PM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: Re: [IP] Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Termination Fees Hurt Consumers Dave [for IP]-- Re: cell phone contracts. I think the way this works is that you can
get a cellphone at a below-market price from your service provider in
return for a one- or two-year contract, OR you can buy your phone elsewhere and get the service without a contract (or maybe a contract
of shorter duration). So this is a trade-off, you get a price break on your instrument in return for a longer contract. But you don't have to take this; you can still avoid the lengthy contract by buying
your own phone at a market price. Why is this a problem? If you don't like the long contract, then don't take the price break on the phone. Seems to me a perfectly legit deal. The practice of automatic contract renewal I think is sleazy, but it is very widespread. Even Consumer Reports automatically re-ups my subscription on my credit card every year, and CR is a very legit outfit. Now let's be honest here. If you sign a contract to get the cheaper phone, then as soon as you actually have the phone you want to get out of the contract, and this seems to be what this is all about. "Gimme the cheap phone, then I'll whine about how I'm being exploited by a long-term contract". Pretty cheesy. Professor Gerald R. Faulhaber Business and Public Policy Dept. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104 ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Farber" <dave () farber net> To: "Ip Ip" <ip () v2 listbox com> Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 10:05 PM Subject: [IP] Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Termination Fees Hurt ConsumersBegin forwarded message: From: Monty Solomon <monty () roscom com> Date: October 5, 2005 3:00:50 AM EDT To: undisclosed-recipient:; Subject: Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Termination Fees Hurt
Consumers Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Termination Fees Hurt Consumers August 2005 Executive Summary http://masspirg.org/MA.asp?id2=18535 Press Release http://masspirg.org/MA.asp?id2=18541 Full Report http://masspirg.org/reports/lockedinacell05.pdf ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as gerry-faulhaber () mchsi com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/ interesting- people/------------------------------------- You are subscribed as gerry-faulhaber () mchsi com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting- people/
------------------------------------- You are subscribed as rsd3414 () ACRretail com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting- people/ ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as ken.figueredo () analysys com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/ ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Terminati on Fees Hurt Consumers David Farber (Oct 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- more on Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Terminati on Fees Hurt Consumers David Farber (Oct 11)
- more on Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Terminati on Fees Hurt Consumers David Farber (Oct 11)
- more on Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Terminati on Fees Hurt Consumers David Farber (Oct 12)
- more on Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Terminati on Fees Hurt Consumers David Farber (Oct 12)
- more on Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Terminati on Fees Hurt Consumers David Farber (Oct 14)
- more on Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Terminati on Fees Hurt Consumers David Farber (Oct 16)
- more on Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Terminati on Fees Hurt Consumers David Farber (Oct 16)
- more on Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Terminati on Fees Hurt Consumers David Farber (Oct 16)
- more on Locked In a Cell: How Cell Phone Early Terminati on Fees Hurt Consumers David Farber (Oct 16)