Interesting People mailing list archives
more on Patent reform in Congress
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 13:02:49 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: John Levine <johnl () iecc com> Date: May 16, 2005 1:00:24 PM EDT To: Rob Raisch <info () raisch com> Cc: dave () farber net Subject: Re: [IP] Patent reform in Congress Hi, Rob.
1. I invent something useful, 2. I patent it (which gives me the right to exploit my invention for a period of time), and 3. I then sell that right to someone else because for whatever reason I am unable to commercialize it myself. So, the new patent-holder finds an infringer and decides to protect their newly purchased property rights? And that's a "troll"?
Yes, for two reasons. The practical reason is that the quality of issued patents, particularly in computing but also in general, is not very good. A lot of these patents egregiously fail to meet the standard of originality and non-obvousness, but even the simplest patent litigation is very expensive, six figures and up. So the trolls set the license price low enough that it's cheaper to pay than to sue and win. Basically, it's a shakedown. The theoretical reason is that the patent system is based on a bargain between the inventors and the American people, explicitly included in the Consitution "to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts." We give the inventor a 17 year monopoly on an invention, in return for which he discloses it rather than keeping it a trade secret, and we all get to use it after the 17 years are up. (Copyrights are based on a similar bargain, something that Disney and the RIAA really, really hope we forget.) It is hard for me to see how patent shakedowns meet the purpose for which patents exist. They don't reward the inventor, and are not except via the most tortuous logic likely to encourage future inventions or patent disclosures. R's, John ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on Patent reform in Congress David Farber (May 16)