Interesting People mailing list archives

What media monopolies?


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:48:24 -0400



Begin forwarded message:

From: h_bray () globe com
Date: August 26, 2005 10:50:54 AM EDT
To: dave () farber net
Subject: What media monopolies?






                          News Release                         |
|            FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
|
|            August 26, 2005
|
|                                              CONTACT: Patrick Ross or
Amy|
|
Smorodin|
|
202-289-8928|
|
|
|
|
|                             Media Monopolies Are a Myth
|
|              Thierer and English Cite Declining Market Capitalizations
|
|
|
| WASHINGTON D.C. - If the stock market is any indication, the
|
|            argument that just a few large media conglomerates control
the|
| market for what we see, hear and read, is completely without
|
| merit. So conclude Adam Thierer and Daniel English in the new
|
|            Progress on Point, "Testing 'Media Monopoly' Claims: A Look
at|
|            What Markets Say," released by the Progress & Freedom
|
| Foundation. In their paper, Thierer and English evaluate the
|
|            market performance of five large media outlets and deduce
that|
|            declining stock value -- market caps down 52% over the last
|
|            four years -- is a clear indication that the corporations
|
|            could not possibly be acting as monopolies.
|
|
|
|            According to Thierer, Director of PFF's Center for Digital
|
| Media Freedom, and economist English, today's media market is
|
| more diverse and highly competitive than ever before, a point
|
|            is illustrated by a 200 percent increase in the number of
|
| media outlets over the past forty years. That competition is
|
|            reflected in the market performance of five of the largest
|
|            media operators. "By looking at the performance of publicly
|
| traded media firms and their stock over the past five years,
|
| it is readily apparent that monopolists do not dominate this
|
|            marketplace," Thierer and English write. "Indeed, quite the
|
|            opposite is true. Large, traditional media companies are
|
| struggling to adapt to a very rapidly evolving media market."
|
|
|
|            The authors argue that if the media industry is truly
|
| controlled by monopolies, investors would be clamoring to buy
|
| media stock. "Our analysis reveals that these five firms have
|
| lost a combined 52 percent of their value (in terms of market
|
|            capitalization) over the past five years, making it
impossible|
| to conclude that these firms possess excessive market power.
|
|            Simply stated, if this industry was 'monopolistic' or even
|
| 'oligopolistic,' its top firms would not be losing that sort
|
|            of value."
|
|
|
| Thierer and English also compare the stock performance of the
|
|            five large media firms with the so called "new media"
|
| companies to further prove that older firms do not monopolize
|
|            the media market. "(T)he media marketplace is far more
dynamic|
|            and competitive than critics imagine. If any of these firms
|
| were 'monopolists,' they would go down in history as some of
|
|            the worst performing monopolists of all time. Not only have
|
|            they failed to recoup 'excessive' profits, but haven't even
|
|            been able to return to value of their stocks to pre-2000
|
|            levels. Further, at least in terms of stock market
|
|            performance, they are being easily outpaced by 'new media'
|
| companies such as Yahoo! and Google, who are stealing away an
|
|            increasingly large share of the advertising revenue pie."
|
|
|
|            The issue of media monopolies is also explored in Media
Myths:|
| Making Sense of the Debate Over Media Ownership, authored by
|
| Adam Thierer and recently published by The Progress & Freedom
|
|            Foundation. Media Myths  debunks longstanding arguments in
|
|            favor of aggressive regulation of media ownership.
|
|
|
| The Progress & Freedom Foundation is a market-oriented think
|
| tank that studies the digital revolution and its implications
|
|            for public policy. It is a 501(c)(3) research & educational
|
|            organization.



-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: