Interesting People mailing list archives
The regulatory constraints of deploying fiber networks
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:15:58 -0500
Begin forwarded message: From: "Robert J. Berger" <rberger () ibd com> Date: November 12, 2004 4:36:05 PM ESTTo: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne () warpspeed com>, Dave Farber <dave () farber net> Subject: FW: [news] The regulatory constraints of deploying fiber networks
------ Forwarded Message From: <CAnet-NEWS () emperor canarie ca> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:46:27 -0500 (EST) Subject: [news] The regulatory constraints of deploying fiber networks For more information on this item please visit the CANARIE CA*net 4 Optical Internet program web site at http://www.canarie.ca/canet4/library/list.html ------------------------------------------- [Here are a couple of excellent papers on the regulatory challenges of deploying fiber networks. Although there is a general consensus thatfacilities based competition is the ideal outcome, there is a lot of debate of how it can be achieved. Some regulators believe that the mere existence of intermodal technologies such as fiber, wireless and broadband over power line will ultimately create facilities based competition. Other argue that
facilities based technologies does not necessarily guarantee facilities based competition. They argue that incumbents can easily undermine the business case for new facilities based competition through bundling of services and leveraging their existing infrastructure paid for by theircustomers through their previously sanctioned monopoly. Some countries like
Greece and Ireland also believe that government may have to take a more pro-active role and stimulate the development of facilities basedcompetition by funding open access condominium regional optical networks --
BSA]In Phoenix Center Policy Perspectives No. 04-04 entitled The Creeping Tide of the Gathering Storm, Phoenix Center President Lawrence J. Spiwak argues that the current FCC has turned the maximum that competition policy should "focus on probabilities, not epheneral possibilities" on its head by relying on anecdotal evidence of intermodal competition to justify the increasing premature deregulation of the incumbent Bell monopolists. As such, Spiwak
arges that as competitive carriers rapidly exit the market, verticalintegration becomes ensconced, and choices continue to diminish, there is a gathering storm on the telecommunications horizon. Thus, concludes Spiwak,
"If end-users ˆ both large and small ˆ don't develop a Œconstituency forcompetition' soon and let policymakers know that these issues are important to their bottom-lines, policymakers will continue to ignore telecoms users
and the Bells' regulatory capture of the political process will proceed undiminished." A copy of this Perpective may be downloaded free at: http://www.phoenix-center.org/perspectives/Perspective04-04Final.pdf The 'Legacy Trap' - Regulatory Barriers to Fibre Deployment in the EUhttp://www.europeftthcouncil.com/extra/PDF/ 181_FTTH_Regulatory_Barriers_24-0
6_ _fin_3.pdfThe European FTTH Council is concerned that the current legal and regulatory
context fails to provide the private sector with sufficient certainty to trigger a large-scale deployment that is required for fibre in the local access network ------------------------------------- ___________________________________________ To SUBSCRIBE: send an e-mail message to majordomo () canarie ca The text of the message should only say subscribe news <your e-mail address> ------ End of Forwarded Message ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- The regulatory constraints of deploying fiber networks David Farber (Nov 12)