Interesting People mailing list archives
more THROW YOUR VOTE AWAY, REDUX.
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 21:28:35 -0400
Begin forwarded message: No, Dave, you are absolutely right. After the Gore-Bush fiasco in Florida in 2000, I suggested paper receipts as a solution to a friend who is one of the leading election consultants in Michigan. He rebuked me for being so foolish. Giving receipts to the voters is an invitation to fraud. The optical scan system offers efficient electronic tallying and a paper record that can be secured should a recount become necessary. The paper records must go into locked and sealed boxes kept by the elections agency. The Gore-Bush debacle has never been understood properly. The Presidential race in Florida in 2000 was a TIE. The difference in votes between Bush and Gore was simply smaller than the precision of the tallying mechanism. The nation rushed to dispose of punch card voting because of the images of election referees staring at hanging chads. But punch card voting is efficient and it, too, provides a paper record. The famously flawed butterfly ballot and the reprehensibly sloppy process that flagged innocents as felons were much more important issues than the use of punch card voting. The only problem is that election law doesn't embrace the notion of a statistical tie, so we rushed to replace punch cards with purely electronic machines whose risks are FAR more ominous. /rich ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more THROW YOUR VOTE AWAY, REDUX. David Farber (May 08)