Interesting People mailing list archives

more on IEEE's positon paper on offshoring


From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 07:39:15 -0500


Delivered-To: dfarber+ () ux13 sp cs cmu edu
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 23:39:20 -0800
From: Larry Tesler <tesler () pobox com>
Subject: Re: [IP] IEEE's positon paper on offshoring
X-Sender: larry () nomodes com (Unverified)
To: dave () farber net

Dave,

I don't fault IEEE-USA for taking a position against offshoring. I'd be unhappy if someone offshored my job, too. And their position paper offers some constructive ideas. But am I the only one to see the irony in their having to raise this issue at all?

In the nineteenth century and the first half of the twentieth, blue collar workers protested whenever their companies automated their jobs away by hiring--guess who--engineers.

Many blue collar workers suffered serious financial consequences from the loss of their jobs. But, as technology advanced, the economy grew. By the end of the twentieth century, overall unemployment reached very low levels and the country prospered. Engineers were regarded as heroes instead of job thieves.

Meanwhile, generations of American kids grew up watching TV or playing video games, the fruits of American innovation. At the same time, kids overseas studied math and science and got into good universities. Many U.S. universities and employers could not find enough qualified or even interested Americans to fill their ranks, so they accepted applicants from overseas. The influx of talent fueled further advances in technology.

Then many people became concerned that high-tech American jobs were going to immigrant workers. One can argue whether employers used H1-B visas mainly to save money or mainly to find qualified candidates. But there's no question that these jobs were domestic, and at pay levels at or not far below prevailing rates.

After the so-called Internet bubble burst, high-tech unemployment rose. This, in turn, led to decreases in the number of H1-B visas that could be issued. Problem solved? No. Now many people are concerned because some high-tech American jobs are no longer going to permanent and temporary residents. Some are going to overseas engineers who are working for a fraction of what companies gave H1-B workers who paid taxes and spent money here.

Some economists believe that the foreign workers taking American jobs will use their new-found incomes to buy imported products. If these economists are right, then perhaps some of our unemployed engineers, whose ranks swelled by 2% between 2002 and 2003, could invent innovative products for these newly monied foreign workers to buy. I know that this is easier said than done. But the competitiveness recommendations in the IEEE-USA position paper offer some approaches worthy of discussion.

Some economists also believe that the main reason manufacturing is moving overseas is not because of cheap labor, but because countries like China are investing in automation more than we are. Perhaps American engineers could do something to increase American factory automation, thereby creating jobs for their unemployed peers.

Of course, more automation would put more blue collars out of work.

Larry Tesler

--

WASHINGTON, March 18 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Offshoring contributes to high
unemployment levels among U.S. technologists, and poses a serious, long-term
challenge to the nation's technological and innovative leadership, its
economic vitality and its military and homeland security, according to a
position recently adopted by IEEE-USA.

"We must develop a coordinated national strategy to maintain U.S.
technological leadership and promote job growth in the United States,"
IEEE-USA President John Steadman said. "But it's going to be difficult to
remain technologically competitive, if we continue offshoring the jobs of
our innovators at rates currently projected."
...
The EE joblessness rate rose by 47.6 percent in
2003 to a record 6.2 percent, compared to 4.2 percent in 2002. The 2003
unemployment rate for computer scientists and systems analysts reached an
all-time high of 5.2 percent.
...



-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: