"Matrix" database is future of law enforcement say police

[Dave Farber <dave () farber net>]

Police Say Matrix Crime Database Needed

[]


[]

[]

[]


By MATT APUZZO
Associated Press Writer

February 10, 2004, 7:23 PM EST

HARTFORD, Conn. -- Connecticut's top police official told lawmakers Tuesday 
that a multistate crime database represents the future of law enforcement, 
despite the heavy criticism privacy activists are heaping on the system.

Without the database, known as Matrix, Col. Timothy Barry said, "It's kind 
of like fighting with one hand behind your back."

Privacy advocates criticize Matrix as an encroachment on civil liberties 
because it combines state-held criminal and vehicle files with billions of 
public records maintained by a private database company.

Six states are members, but at least seven others have backed out of the 
program because of privacy or cost concerns. In Utah, which put its Matrix 
membership on hold this month, an oversight committee met for the first 
time Tuesday to evaluate the state's participation.

At a hearing in Hartford, Barry said that because Matrix lets police 
combine law enforcement data with such public records as property holdings, 
professional licenses, sex offender lists and incorporation papers, it lets 
officers quickly identify kidnapping suspects and locate fugitives.

"We can reduce the time from days and weeks to seconds and minutes," he said.

State investigators have made about 1,000 requests to the database since it 
went online in November, officials said.

Supportive claims also were aired as the Utah committee met in Salt Lake 
City. Kirk Torgensen, chief deputy to Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff, 
said law enforcement "desperately needs" Matrix, and said the committee 
could find ways to balance constitutional concerns with its use.

Still, critics of the program have questioned its effectiveness.

"What has been done with the information so far? Has anything good 
happened? Have we caught a terrorist?" Utah state Sen. Michael Waddoups asked.

Matrix, short for the Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange, began 
in 2002 in Florida. It since has drawn in Connecticut, Michigan, New York, 
Ohio and Pennsylvania, helped by $12 million in initial funding from the 
federal government.

Barry Steinhardt, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's 
technology and privacy program, told lawmakers in Connecticut that the 
database could be tracking private information about individuals who have 
never been suspected of a crime.

Matrix proponents say the system only accesses publicly available 
information and only does so in active criminal investigations, with all 
queries logged and audited to prevent abuse.

"I'm a little perplexed by such stark disagreement," said Connecticut state 
Rep. Steven Mikutel, a Democrat. "It's almost like two different worlds 
we're talking about here."

The Connecticut Legislature's Public Safety Committee held the hearing in 
response to privacy concerns, but the panel is not expected to make a 
recommendation about the program.

Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, who has questioned the 
privacy implications of his state's involvement, did not attend Tuesday's 
hearing, but a spokesman said he is reviewing program materials.

* __

Associated Press Writer Patty Henetz in Salt Lake City contributed to this 
report.


http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-terror-database,0,6391968.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines

-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/