Texas Atty Genl "rejects" strong federal medical-privacy law

[Dave Farber <dave () farber net>]

Delivered-To: dfarber+ () ux13 sp cs cmu edu
X-Sender: jwarren () mail well com
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 16:03:47 -0800
To: Dave Farber:;, Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
From: Jim Warren <jwarren () well com>
Subject: Texas Atty Genl "rejects" strong federal medical-privacy law
X-VBS-Filter-Version: 1.15 (well.com modified) (smtp)

An interesting clash between (1) open-government vs. personal-privacy, and 
(2) state's rights vs. federal authority.  --jim

At 12:34 PM -0800 2/29/04, pmarshall <pwm () comcast net> posted to 
med-privacy () venice essential org:

> TEXAS AG SAYS NO TO HIPAA: Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott ruled
> Friday that the state's public information law takes
> precedence over a far-reaching federal medical privacy law, a legal
> opinion he called the strongest in the nation.
>
> His decision means Texas media outlets and individuals will have access
> to public information that some hospitals and authorities have
> declined to release under the Federal Health Insurance Portability and
> Accountability Act, known as HIPAA.
>
> "In Texas, government records are presumed open unless a specific
> exception applies. HIPAA is not an exception to the rule of openness in
> the state of Texas," Abbott told the board of directors of the Freedom
> of Information Foundation of Texas at The Associated Press'
> Dallas bureau, where he released his legal opinion.
>
> HIPAA, a sweeping overhaul of the federal health care privacy laws that
> took effect in April, has frustrated journalists and others who
> have found most basic information hard to come by.
>
> "What this means is, governmental bodies who've been using HIPAA as a
> shield just lost that protection," Abbott said.
>
> Abbott said Texas authorities worked closely on the language of the
> ruling with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which
> created the privacy regulations under the law. Still, he said, he
> wouldn't be surprised if the ruling were challenged in court.
>
> http://www.dfw.com/mld/startelegram/news/state/7950211.htm
>
> [FOI Advocate]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Med-privacy mailing list
> Med-privacy () lists essential org
> http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/med-privacy


-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/